S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Option price received from joint ventures for getting right to acquire further shares in joint venture company-Advance towards sale price of shares-Capital receipt [S. 28(i), 45]

S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-In the absence of transfer of units in a project neither a sale can be recorded in the books of the assessee nor any income can be said to have arisen in the hands of the assessee and consequently, no income can be brought to tax in the hands of the assessee-Estimate of profit at 8% as contractor was deleted. [S. 2(47)]

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal – Duties- Housing project – Tribunal cannot differ from earlier order of Tribunal in assessee’s own case and follow the order of Tribunal in another assessee – The matter has to be referred to larger Bench in case the Tribunal desires to differ from earlier order of the Tribunal – The Tribunal should have considered the order of the High court which was placed on record through rectification application- Order of Tribunal is set aside . [ S. 80IB(10) , 254(2, 260A, Art , 226 ]

S.37(1): Business expenditure – Referral commission paid to doctors – Violation of the professional conduct- Not allowable as deduction. [ Indian Medical Council ( Professional Conduct Etiquette and Ethics ) Regulations 2002, R. 6.8. 1(d) ]

S.37(1): Business expenditure – Referral commission paid to doctors – Violation of the professional conduct- Not allowable as deduction. [ Indian Medical Council ( Professional Conduct Etiquette and Ethics ) Regulations 2002, R. 6.8. 1(d) ]

S. 32: Depreciation – Asset purchased from and leased back – Entitle depreciation -Assessment – Direction of the Tribunal to follow the Judgement of Special Bench – While giving effect High Court decided contrary to the Judgement of Special Bench – Assessing Officer is bound to follow the order of High Court -Asset purchased from and leased back – Entitle depreciation – Business expenditure – Amount paid fees paid to ITC Classic Finance Ltd has direct nexus with acquisition of the machinery from RSEB – Allowable as deduction . [ S. 50, 143(3), 254(1)]

S. 148A: Reassessment – Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice – Order passed without considering the replies of the assessee – Assessed income was Rs 10, 07 05, 88, 04 , 543 ) Rupees One lakh seven hundred and five crores eighty lakhs four thousand five hundred and forty -three only) – Information to suggest – arbitrary, cryptic and without application of mind – not considering the response of the Assessee – Mechanical approval – Order under section 148A(d) set aside to the stage of the show cause Notice. (S. 147, 148 , 148A(b), 151 , Art , 226 ]

S. 90: Double taxation relief – Long term capital gains – Transfer of shares – Beneficial Owner – cannot be assumed or inferred – AO to decide whether the concept of “beneficial owner” is inbuilt in the scheme of Article 13 – Matter remanded – DTAA-India – Mauritius. [ S. 143(3),154 , Art . 10, 11 , 13(4) ]

S.37(1): Business expenditure – Referral commission paid to doctors – Violation of the professional conduct- Not allowable as deduction. [ Indian Medical Council ( Professional Conduct Etiquette and Ethics ) Regulations 2002, R. 6.8. 1(d) ]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Pendency of appeal before CIT(A)-Commissioner can assume jurisdiction under section 263 in respect of issues which have not been considered and decided by Commissioner (Appeals)-Cash credits-Accommodation entries-Revision is held to be valid. [S. 68, 148]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Order passed by the Assessing Officer of a different jurisdiction-Assessment order was passed on basis of an invalid and non est notice, it could not be countenanced in law, and consequently, revisional action is not permissible hence not valid. [S. 127, 143(2), 143(3), 292BB]