Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Lauren Software Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 92 ITR 47 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Consultancy charges paid to technical persons-Expenditure cannot be disallowed on estimate basis.

Viney Corporation Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 92 ITR 59 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.) Carlson Hospitality Marketing (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 92 ITR 27 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Foreign Exchange loss-Allowable as revenue expenditure.

JCIT v. T. V. Today Network Ltd. (2021) 92 ITR 53 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Media business selling advertisement airtime on its Channel-Discount allowed-Allowable as revenue expenditure-Unpaid leave and encashment-Directed the Assessing Officer to verify actual payment. [S. 43B(f)]

Dy.CIT v. Sutham Electric Ltd. (2021) 92 ITR 35 (SN) (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Manufacturer Of Automotive Switchgears-Expenditure on development of designs and tools-Capital expenditure.

Dy.CIT v. Gorakhpur Infrastructure Co. Ltd. (2021) 92 ITR 42 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Periodic maintenance on road very five years-Matching concept-Provision for periodic maintenance-Allowable as revenue expenditure-Provision not includible in book profit. [S. 115J]

Zeenath Transport Company v. ACIT (2021) 92 ITR 460 (Bang.) (Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Mining business-Stopped by order of Supreme Court-Guarantee payments for resuming mining activity-Expenditure on discharging social responsibility-Contributions to flood relief work-Legal fees to Federation of Mining Industries-Allowable as revenue expenditure.

Dy.CIT v. Eastman Exports Global Clothing Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 92 ITR 343 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Lease hold land-Amount spent on construction-Allowable as revenue expenditure-Explanation to section 32(1). [S. 32]

Digiqal Solution Services Pvt. Ltd. v. ADIT (2021) 92 ITR 404 (Chd.) (Trib.)

S. 36(1)(v) : Contribution approved gratuity fund-Contribution of Employees Provident Fund and Employees’ State Insurance-Amendment in 2021 applicable in relation to assessment year 2021-22 and subsequent years-No disallowance can be made. [S. 43B]

Viney Corporation Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 92 ITR 59 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Loan advanced to subsidiary out of own funds-No disallowance can be made.

Mahle Behr India P. Ltd. and Formerly Known as Mahle India Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 190 ITD 852 / 92 ITR 726 / 213 TTJ 481/ 206 DTR 262 (Pune) (Trib.)

S. 35 : Scientific research expenditure-Weighted deduction-Not allowable in respect of expenditure incurred outside India-Expenditure of capital nature is eligible for deduction under section 35(1))iv). [S. 35(1)(iv), 35(2AB]