S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Territorial jurisdiction of High Court-Transfer of case-Pendency of proceedings-Ahmadabad Tribunal decided the appeal-Appeal was filed at Allahabad High Court-Jurisdiction vest with Gujarat High court-Appeal was dismissed. [S. 120, 127(2)]

S. 260A : Appeal-High Court-Territorial jurisdiction of High Court-Transfer of case-Pendency of proceedings-Ahmadabad Tribunal decided the appeal-Appeal was filed at Allahabad High Court-Jurisdiction vest with Gujarat High court-Appeal was dismissed. [S. 120, 127(2)]

S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-lease rent-Tribunal followed order of earlier year and not followed the Judgement of Supreme Court-Miscellaneous application was dismissed-Order rejecting miscellaneous application was set aside-Non-consideration of judgement of Supreme Court is a mistake apparent on record-Matter remanded to Tribunal to decide on merits in accordance with law. [S. 37 (1), 200A]

S. 254(2): Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Recalling the order is beyond the scope and ambit of the powers of the Tribunal-Tribunal has no power to recall its earlier order-Order recalling the order was quashed and set aside- Where Tribunal decides merits erroneously remedy of aggrieved party is to appeal before High Court – DTAA-India-Sweden-USA. [S. 195(2), 254(1), 260A, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order XLVII Rule 1, Art. 12 (3), Art. 226]

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Revision-Revision order set aside by the Tribunal on the basis of material produced before it which was not produced before the Commissioner was held to be not valid-Order of Tribunal seta side and matter remanded to the Commissioner to decide a fresh in accordance with law. [S. 12AA, 263]

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Delay of 310 days-Inadvertence mistake on part of Chartered Accountant-Delay in filing appeal was condoned. [S. 260A, Limitation Act, 1963, S. 5]

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Full and true disclosure-Settlement commission has considered the case of the assessee as well as the Department, and settled the case based upon the increased offer made by the assessee-There is no procedural error committed by the Commission-Order of single judge was seta side. [S. 245C, Art. 226]

S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Granted immunity based on wrong facts-Order was quashed and remitted back for fresh consideration. [S. 245C, Art. 226]

S. 234B : Interest-Advance tax-Tax deducted at source-Non-resident-Payer deducted tax at source-Levy of interest is held to be not justified.

S. 201 : Deduction at source-Survey-Failure deduct tax at source-Payment to non-residents-Appeal pending before two earlier assessment years-Writ was dismissed-Directed to pursue alternative remedy of appeal. [S. 133A, 201(1), 201(IA), Art. 226)