Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


OnMobile Global Ltd. v. Add. CIT (2021) 90 ITR 18 (SN) (Bang.) (Trib.)

S. 80JJAA : Employment of new workmen-Certificate in form 10DA-High salaries cannot be the basis for denial of exemption.

Rasna Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 90 ITR 39 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 80IC : Special category States-Failure to allocate financial expenses-Assessee allocating on the basis of ratio 58. 67 %-The Assessing Officer computing 58.69%-Held to be justified.

Dy. CIT v. Gopalan Enterprises (India) Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 90 ITR 30 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 80IA : Industrial undertakings-Infrastructure development-Functional Test-Each unit must function independently-Matter remanded. [S. 80IA(4)(iii)]

ACIT v. Parminder Singh Kalra (2021) 90 ITR 419 (Delhi)(Trib)

S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Paintings-Price details and mode pf payment was disclosed-Gold jewellery, Diamond jewellery and Silver Utensils-Quantity less than threshold limit for wealth-tax-Deletion of addition is held to be justified. [S. 132]

Swarn Gems P. Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 90 ITR 14 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Confirmation was filed-Identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of transaction was established-Addition was held to be not justified. [S. 133(6)]

Balasahev Vyankat Gaikwad v. ACIT (2021) 90 ITR 66 (SN) (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-No evidence was produced-Addition is held to be justified-Disallowance of agricultural income was also up held.

Dy. CIT v. GSNR Rice Industries Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 90 ITR 114/ 213 TTJ 17 (/ (2022) 215 DTR 65 Chennai)(Trib.) Dy. CIT v. Kanakkilianallur Narayana Reddiyar Manivannan (2021) 90 ITR 114/ 213 TTJ 17 / ( 2022) 215 DTR 65 (Chennai)(Trib.) Dy. CIT v. Kanakkilianallur Narayana Nehru (2021) 90 ITR 114/ 213 TTJ 17 / ( 2022) 215 DTR 65 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Books of account-Survey-Diary, notebook and data of deleted entries retrieved from computer central processing unit-Not books of account-Addition cannot be made without any corroborative evidence-Presumption u/s 292C is rebuttable. [S. 2(12A), 69, 69A, 69C, 133A, 292C]

ACIT v. Sur Buildcon Pvt. Ltd (2021) 90 ITR 300 (Delhi)(Trib.) ACIT v. BBN Transportation Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 90 ITR 300 (Delhi) (Trib.) ACIT v. Goldstar Cement Pvt. Ltd. (2021)90 ITR 300 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 68 : Cash credits-Share capital and share premium-No cash was deposited-Sufficient bank balances-Need not to prove source of the source.

JCIT (OSD) v. Santosh Suresh Gupta (2021) 90 ITR 24 (SN) (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 54F : Capital gains-Investment in a residential house-Construction of residential house within three years-Completion of construction is not mandatory-Once construction started and amount invested the condition of section is fulfilled. [S. 45]

Boota Singh v. ITO (2021) 90 ITR 281 (Amritsar)(Trib.) Babu Singh v. ITO (2021) 90 ITR 281 (Amritsar)(Trib.) Nachhater Singh v. ITO (2021) 90 ITR 281 (Amritsar)(Trib.)

S. 54B : Capital gains-Land used for agricultural purposes-Directed to apply uniform rate while computing capital gains and grant relief. [S. 45, 55A, Art. 12]