Category: Income-Tax Act

Archive for the ‘Income-Tax Act’ Category


Sureshkumar S. Lakhotia v. National E-Assessment Centre (2021) 438 ITR 225 /(2022) 284 Taxman 340 (Bom.)(HC)

S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Natural justice-Personal hearing was not granted-Order was set aside. [Art. 226]

M. Thirugnanam v. ACIT (2021) 282 Taxman 481 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 144 : Best judgment assessment-Natural justice-Adjournment-Order passed without giving further time to explain the case-Matter remanded. [S. 142(1), Art. 226]

M. Thirugnanam v. ACIT (2021) 282 Taxman 481 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 144 : Best judgment assessment-Natural justice-Adjournment-Order passed without giving further time to explain the case-Matter remanded. [S. 142(1), Art. 226]

Kalidoss Bharath v. ACIT (2021) 282 Taxman 478 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 144 : Best judgment assessment-Violation of principle of natural justice-Details filed in response to notice u/s 142(1) was not considered-No personal hearing was not granted-Order was set aside [S. 44AB, 142(1), Art 226]

Jaffaorulla Syeaadunnishaa v. ACIT (2021) 282 Taxman 400 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 144 : Best judgment assessment-Violation of principle of natural justice-Sufficient time was not granted and personal hearing was not granted-Matter was remitted back. [S. 143(2), 156, Art. 226]

PCIT v. Bell Ceramics Ltd. (No. 1) (2021) 437 ITR 523 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 144 : Best judgment assessment-Rejection of books of account-Excess consumption-Deletion of addition is held to be justified-No substantial question of law. [S. 44AB, 260A]

PCIT v. Bell Ceramics Ltd. (No. 1) (2021)437 ITR 523 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 144 : Best judgment assessment-Rejection of books of account-Excess consumption-Deletion of addition is held to be justified-No substantial question of law. [S. 44AB, 260A]

Three C. Homes (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 282 Taxman 134/ 204 DTR 105/ 321 CTR 513 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Adjournment was sought was granted-Allegation of no such email was generated from the office of the Income-tax department-Prima facie committed penal offence by forging documents-CBI was to be directed to enquire as to whether e-mail had been issued to assessee or not, and if so, by whom. [S. 142(1), Art. 226]

Dy. CIT v. Salem Sree Ramavilas Chit Co. P. Ltd. (2021) 437 ITR 597 / 323 CTR 207 / 207 DTR 273(Mad.)(HC) Editorial : Order of the single judge in Salem Sree Ramavilas Chit Co. P. Ltd v. Dy.CIT (2020) 423 ITR 525 / 187 DTR 217/ 313 CTR 473(Mad) (HC) set aside.

S. 143(3) : Assessment-E-Procedure facility-Natural justice-Observations regarding E-Proceedings and findings on merits of assessment order was held to be not called for-Order of single judge was set aside [S. 69A, 142, Art. 226]

Rakindo Kovai Township Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 438 ITR 474 (Mad.) (HC)

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Principle of natural justice-Appeal-Alternative remedy-Writ is not maintainable. [S. 246A, Art. 226]