During the pendency of scrutiny assessment proceedings, the assessee preferred an application before the Settlement Commission offering additional income. The Settlement Commission passed an order dated May 27, 2016 under section 245D(4) of the Act, and determined the total income and computed the tax liability. The assessee filed an application for rectification of the order before the Settlement Commission which came to be rejected. The assessee challenged the orders of the Settlement Commission which was allowed by the Single judge. On appeal division Bench dismissing, the appeal that the judgment in the case of Star Television News Ltd v. UOI (2009) 317 ITR 66(Bom)(HC), UOI v. Star Television News Ltd (2015) 373 ITR 528 (SC) was not applicable to the applications filed subsequent to June 1, 2007. The single judge had meticulously arrived at a decision on marshalling the facts of the case vis-a-vis the ruling of Star Television News L td. with the relevant provisions applicable to the facts of the present case. The order was justified. Settlement Commission ought to have entertained rectification application filed by assessee. SLP of Revenue is dismissed. (AY.2006-07 to 2012-13)
CIT (Central) v. RNS Infrastructure Ltd. (2024) 300 Taxman 101 (SC) Editorial : CIT (Central) v. RNS Infrastructure Ltd (2022) 286 Taxman 509/ 442 ITR 417 (Karn)(HC)
S. 245D : Settlement Commission-Limitation-Delay in passing order not due to assessee-Delay could be condoned-SLP of Revenue is dismissed. [S. 245D(4A), 245D(4A)(iii),245HA(1)(iv), Art. 136]
Leave a Reply