The Court affirmed that the claim for depreciation was optional for the assessee for years prior to the insertion of Explanation 5 to Section 32(1) with effect from 01.04.2002. Referred CIT v. Mahendra Mills/Arun Textile ‘C’ / Humphreys / Glassgow Consultants (2000) 109 Taxman 225 / 243 ITR 56 (SC)
CIT, (LTU) v. Reliance Industries Ltd. [2024] 161 taxmann.com 423 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 32 : Depreciation-Optional claim-Claim for depreciation was optional prior to insertion of Explanation 5 to Section 32(1)-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S. 260A]
Leave a Reply