The Assessing Officer passed an order under section 148A(d) alleging that the assessee had failed to demonstrate that certain receipts had been fully disclosed. The High Court found that some allegations were raised for the first time in the said order, thereby denying the assessee an opportunity to respond. As regards other receipts, the assessee had provided a detailed explanation in its reply to the notice under section 148A(b). The Court observed that the Assessing Officer, without giving reasons for not accepting the explanation, merely made a bald statement that the assessee had failed to demonstrate disclosure. The Court held that the order was passed without application of mind. Consequently, the sanction granted under section 151 and the consequent notice issued under section 148 were also quashed. (AY. 2019-20)
Classic Stripes (P.) Ltd v. DCIT (2024) 162 taxmann.com 467 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Application of mind-An order passed under section 148A(d) without considering the assessee’s reply and by raising new allegations for the first time in the order itself is invalid due to non‑application of mind and is liable to be set aside. [S. 148,148A(b) 148A(d), 151, Art. 226]
Leave a Reply