Dana India (P) Ltd v. DCIT (2021) 211 TTJ 271 (Pune)(Trib.)

S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arms’ length price-safe harbour rules are optional for an eligible assessee-assessee has not exercised option for the safe harbour rules-entire set of rules from 10TA to 10TG cannot be operationalised. (ITR, 10B(1)€ & 10 TA)

In this case the Appellate Tribunal held that if an assessee has not exercised option for the safe harbour rules, the entire set of rules from 10TA to 10TG cannot be operationalized in determining the Arm’s Length Price under the TNMM, or for that matter any other method under rule 10B, rule 10TA is not relevant. As such the TPO is not justified in applying the definition of ‘operating profit’ and ‘operating expense’ given under rule 10TA for the purposes of determining the Arm’s Length Price of the international transactions in the ‘manufacturing activity’ under the TNMM as enshrined in rule 10B((1)(e) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. (AY.203-14)