DCIT v. AIA Engineering Ltd. (2025) 238 TTJ 632 / 179 taxmann.com 152 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Settlement of patent dispute-Compensation paid for settlement of civil litigation is allowable business expenditure and not hit by Explanation 1 to section 37(1). [S. 37(1), Explns. 1 & 3]

The assessee paid compensation to a foreign company for the settlement of a patent infringement dispute through an out-of-court settlement. The Tribunal held that the payment was neither a penalty nor for any purpose prohibited by law, but was incurred for commercial expediency to settle a bona fide civil dispute. Explanation 3 to section 37(1), inserted by the Finance Act, 2022, enlarging the scope of “prohibited by law”, is prospective and cannot be applied to AY 2014-15. Accordingly, the disallowance was deleted. (AY. 2014-15)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*