Search and seizure action was conducted on 7-4 2016 , on the basis of the information under Information Exchange Agreement and thereafter information received from competent Authority of Singapore , the notice was issued under 10(1) of the Black Money ( Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets ) and Imposition Act 2015 and assessment order was passed making addition under section 10(3) of the Act . The order has not attained the finality . The Assessing Officer passed protective assessment under income tax Act , making addition under section 68 of the Act. On appeal against protective assessment , the CIT(A) deleted the addition made on protective assessment . On appeal by the Revenue, dismissing the appeal of the Revenue , the Tribunal held that once additions have been made under Black Money Act , the same can not be made under the Income -tax Act on the same set of facts . ( ITA No. 426 & 427 /Del/2022 dt . 19 -4 2023 )( AY. 2013 -14 , 2014 -15 )
DCIT v. Ashok Kumar Singh ( 2023) BCAJ – May- P. 35 ( Delhi)( Trib)
S. 68 : Cash credits – Protective assessment – Addition made under Black money Act – Not attained finality – Deletion of addition was affirmed . [S. 143(3), Black Money ( Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets ) and Imposition Act 2015 , S .10(1), 10(3) ]