DCIT v. Center Point Gems (P.) Ltd. (2024) 208 ITD 213 (Surat) (Trib.)

S. 69 :Unexplained investments-Bogus purchases-Accommodation entries-Disallowance is restricted at rate of 6 per cent of bogus purchases-Sale of shares-Explained the source of purchase-Order of CIT(A deleting the addition is affirmed-Reassessment is affirmed.[S. 147, 148]

Tribunal restricted the disallowances at rate of 6 per cent of bogus purchases. As regards purchase of shares  order of CIT(A) deleting the addition is affirmed. As regards re assessment   there existed new information with Assessing Officer from credible sources, but also he had applied his mind and recorded conclusion that purchases claimed were non-genuine and therefore bogus. Reassessment is affirmed.   (AY. 2012-13)