Assessing Officer passed assessment order under making addition under section 68 of the Act. Addition is affirmed by the CIT(A). On appeal before the Tribunal the assessee engaged a Chartered Accountant to contest and to make effective representation before Tribunal. However, said Chartered Accountant remained negligent towards his statutory rights of appeal and case of assessee could not be represented effectively. Consequently the appeal was dismissed ex parte by Tribunal. On appeal the Court held that since negligence was not attributable to assessee, another opportunity of hearing is granted and the matter is restored before Tribunal. However the assessee is Directed to deposit cost of Rs 25000 before the Tribunal. (AY. 2012-13)
Desert Infraspace (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2024) 300 Taxman 406 (Guj.)(HC)
S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Ex parte order by the Tribunal-Un explained cash credits-Negligent of the Chartered Accountant to make effective representation before the Tribunal-Negligence was not attributable to assessee,-Matter is restored before Tribunal to give an opportunity of hearing-Directed to deposit cost of Rs 25000 before the Tribunal.[S. 68, 260A]
Leave a Reply