Assessee involved in providing high-end services to its clients involving higher special knowledge and domain expertise in field, it could not be taken as a comparable to assessee which was providing business support services to its group entities. Similarly a company had ventured into areas of health care sector, viz., Medical Transcription, Medical Coding, Medical Billing, Receivables Management (Collections), same can be held to be functionally dissimilar to assessee rendering ITE services. Acompany achieved abnormal growth of 56 per cent, said company could not have been adopted as comparable to assessee-company. A company had outsourced services to third party vendors which constituted 20.39 per cent of its total expenses, it could not be selected as comparable to assessee. (AY. 2008-09)
Deutche CIB Centre (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 187 ITD 506 / 209 TTJ 137 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comaprable-Cannot be comparable with business support services-Functionally dissimilar cannot be comparable-Abnormal growth due to restricting cannot be cpmparable-Company had outsourced services to third party vendors cannot be held to be comparable.