Dinesh Somatmal Dhokar v. ITO (2024) 230 TTJ 137 / 240 DTR 111 / 38 NYPTTJ 647 (Mum)(Trib)

S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty-Concealment-Bogus purchase-Addition made on estimate basis-Penalty is not leviable-Omission to strike off one of the twin charges in the notice-Not invalidate penalty proceedings. [S.69C, 274]

Tribunal deleted penalty  on merit as regards addition is made on alleged bogus purchases on estimate basis. Tribunal also held that   omission to strike off one of the twin charges in the notice can not invalidate penalty proceedings. Followed,  Veena Estate (P) Ltd. v. CIT (2024) 336 CTR  688/ 461 ITR 483 (Bom)(HC). (AY.2009-10,  2010-11)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*