Dy.CIT v. Sunil Kumar Sharma (2024) 159 taxmann.com 179 (Karn)(HC) Editorial : CIT (Appeals) v. Sunil Kumar Sharma (2024) 300 Taxman 601 (SC)

S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search and seizure-Loose sheet-Not form part of books of account-diaries/loose sheets-Order of Tribunal is affirmed-No substntail question of law.[S. 132, 153A, 260A]

Dismissing the appeal of the Revenue High Court held that it is established in law that a sheet of paper containing typed entries and in loose form, not shown to form part of books of account regularly maintained by assessee or his business entities, do not constitute material evidence and, therefore, action taken by revenue against assessee based on material contained in diaries/loose sheets, was contrary to law and, thus, notices under section 153C were required to be set aside. No substantial question of law.   (AY. 2012-13 to 2018-19)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*