The High Court held that section 153C applies only for AYs where the AO has incriminating material relevant to that year. Without such material, reopening all 10 AYs mechanically is unjustified. In this case, satisfaction notes did not record how seized material had a bearing on the total income for the years reopened. The proceedings were quashed. The Supreme Court dismissed revenue’s SLP due to delay of 162 and 145 days and also on merits. (AY. 2015-16)
Dy. CIT v. Vikas Wahi (2025) 303 Taxman 404 (SC) Editorial: Saksham Commodities Ltd. v. ITO (2024) 161 taxmann.com 485 / 464 ITR 1 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 153C : Assessment-Income of any other person-Search and seizure-No incriminating material-Order of High Court quashing assessment affirmed-Delay in SLP-SLP dismissed on delay as well as merits.[Art. 136]
Leave a Reply