Exotic Realtors & Developers v. PCIT (2024) 231 TTJ 132 / 241 DTR 33 /38 NYPTTJ 993 (Chd) (Trib)

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Assessing Officer has applied his mind-The Principal CIT to hold bare minimum inquiry before passing the order which in the instant case has not happened. Revision order is quashed. [S. 143(3),144, 144B, 147, 263(1)(b)]

Tribunal held that the AO has made enquiries on all the matters from notices issued under s. 142(1) and the assessee has filed submission on the questions in the notices issued by AO from time to time. AO has applied his mind irrespective of the fact that issues were not discussed in the assessment order.  The Principal CIT to hold bare minimum inquiry before passing the order which in the instant case has not happened. Revision order is quashed.  (AY. 2018-19)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*