Held that since the case of the brother of assessee involving a similar issue for the same assessment year had already been sent back to the file of the Assessing Officer to decide the issue afresh, in the interest of justice, the matter was to be remanded back to the Assessing Officer to decide the issue afresh. (AY. 2012-13)
Hemantkumar Gajanan Lad. v. ITO (2025) 213 ITD 366 (Pune) (Trib.)
S. 45: Capital gains-Transfer of rights in plot of land-Following the order of the brother, the matter was remanded back to the Assessing Officer to decide the issue afresh. [S. 147, 148]
Leave a Reply