ITO v. Saroj Rani Gupta (Smt.) (2019) 176 ITD 109 (Kol.)(Trib.)

S. 54F : Capital gains-Investment in a residential house-Belated construction or possession would not be a ground to deny claim of exemption-Two separate flats purchased by assessee had two separate entrances, treated as one residential house – Entitle to exemption. [S. 45]

Dismissing the appeal of the revenue the Tribunal held that, belated construction or possession would not be a ground to deny claim of exemption. Two separate flats purchased by assessee had two separate entrances, treated as one residential house. Entitle to exemption. (AY. 2013-14)