Held, dismissing the writ petition, that the discretion exercised by the authority while passing the order thereby granting stay subject to deposit of 20 per cent. The amount under demand with the facility of instalments could not be said to be arbitrary when such an order was passed with the consent of the assessee. No interference by the court was warranted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Karmayogi Ankushrao Tope Samarth SSK Ltd v. PCIT [2023] 150 taxmann.com 316 / (2025) 482 ITR 728 (Bom)(HC)
S. 220: Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Pending of appeal before CIT(A)-Order passed with consent of assessee-Order could not be quashed. [S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d) 246A, Art. 226]
Leave a Reply