Assessee, a charitable trust, filed its return claiming loss for relevant years. Return is processed under section 143(1) disallowing application of income under section 11(1)(a).Assessee did not act thereon and filed appeal before Commissioner (Appeals) with a delay of 3 years 2 months and 2 years and 2 months for two years respectively. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal as not maintainable on finding of gross negligence. On appeal the Tribunal held that since assessee-trust filed its return in Form 5, which was meant for business incomer, processing of returns denying exemption under section 11(1)(a) was a mistake apparent from record and Commissioner (Appeals) should have directed Assessing Officer to consider assessee’s returns of income as rectification petitions. Matter remanded. (AY. 2014-15, 2015-16)
Kathikode Charitable Trust. v. ITO (2024) 207 ITD 588 (Cochin) (Trib.)
S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Promotion of education, culture and philosophy-Returned filed in wrong form-Filed return in Form 5 claiming loss which is meant for business income-The Assessing Officer is directed to consider return as a rectification petition. [S.12AA, 139(4A), 139(9), 139C, 143(1), 154, Form No 5, Form No 7,]
Leave a Reply