Held that the Assessing Officer carried out elaborate analysis and followed steps enacted in statute and then determined amount of expenditure incurred for earning tax exempt income, merely because he did not expressly record his dissatisfaction about assessee’s calculation, his conclusion can not be rejected. Tribunal also held that only those investments are to be considered for computing disallowance under section 14A which yielded exempt income during year only those investments are to be considered for computing disallowance under section 14A which yielded exempt income during year. (AY. 2019-20)
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. DCIT (2025) 211 ITD 608 (Mum.) (Trib.)
S.14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Merely because the AO did not expressly record his dissatisfaction about assessee’s calculation-The conclusion of the AO cannot be rejected-Only those investments are to be considered for computing disallowance under section 14A which yielded exempt income during year.[R.8D]
Leave a Reply