Krishnan Saravanan v. PCIT [2025] 210 ITD 567 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue –
The NFAP was already adjudicating the disallowance of transport charges u/s. 40(a)(ia), the PCIT had no jurisdiction to revise the order .[ S.40(a)(ia) ]

The issue of disallowance u/s. 40(a)(ia) was already pending adjudication before the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAPC), the Principal Commissioner lacked jurisdiction to invoke Section 263 in view of clause (c) of Explanation 1 to Section 263. Accordingly, the revisionary order under Section 263 was to be set aside.(AY. 2013 -14)

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*