Assessee-charitable society was primarily engaged in activity of letting out of kalyana mandapa. Assessing Officer held that assessee would not be entitled for exemption under section 11 as assessee was charging fees which was more than prescribed limit for letting out mandapa. On appeal the Tribunal held that since letting out was being done on commercial basis by charging exorbitant amount, same would be a commercial activity as per proviso to section 2(15) and denial of exemption is valid. (AY. 2012-13)
Kuchalambal Charities v. ITO (2022) 194 ITD 662 (Bang.)(Trib.)
S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-letting out kalyana mandapa-Commercial activity-Denial of exemption is justified. [S. 2(15) 12A]