Held that jewellery bills found during the search were not substantial, and additions on account of jewellery were unjustified. Tribunal also held that addition cannot be made in respect of a poultry farm sale solely on basis of a photocopy of an agreement to sell, allegedly retrieved from WhatsApp chats of assessee’s husband, without recording statements of buyer or seller and without independent verification of such addition. AY. 2020-21, 2021-22)
Lakhvir Kaur. v. DCIT (2025) 215 ITD 39 (Chd) (Trib.)
S. 69 :Unexplained investments-Jewellery-Jewellery bills found during search were not substantial-Poultry Farm Sale-Photocopy of an agreement to sell, allegedly retrieved from WhatsApp chat-Statement of buyer was not recorded-Additions on account were unjustified.[S. 131(IA), 132]
Leave a Reply