Madhavi Kerkar v. ACIT (2018) 403 ITR 157/253 Taxman 288/ 165 DTR 362 / 302 CTR 340 (Bom) (HC)

S. 179: Private Company – Liability of Directors – Assessing Officer can exercise jurisdiction to recover the dues of the company against the director only when it fails to recover its dues from Private limited company.Order of AO was set aside

Allowing the petition the Court held that ; it is condition precedent for the AO to exercise jurisdiction under S. 179(1) of the Act that to proceed against the directors of the delinquent Private Limited Company only after it has failed to recover its dues from such company. The jurisdictional requirement cannot be said to be satisfied by a mere statement in the impugned order that the recovery proceedings had been conducted against the defaulting Private Limited Company but it had failed to recover its dues. The above statement should be supported by mentioning briefly the types of efforts made and its results. Accordingly the order was set aside . (AY. 2006-07 to 2011-12)

One comment on “Madhavi Kerkar v. ACIT (2018) 403 ITR 157/253 Taxman 288/ 165 DTR 362 / 302 CTR 340 (Bom) (HC)
  1. PRAVEEN SINGLA says:

    HELPFUL