Manohar Lal Sharma v. CBI ( 2018) 252 Taxman 22 (SC) – Digest of case laws

↓ Skip to Main Content

Digest of case laws Online digest of latest case laws

Home
Articles
Ask Your Query
Cause List
Digest
Info
Judgements
Upload Your Articles & Judgements
Others

Home › Tax Laws › Manohar Lal Sharma v. CBI ( 2018) 252 Taxman 22 (SC)

Manohar Lal Sharma v. CBI ( 2018) 252 Taxman 22 (SC)

S. 4 Income Chargeable to charge to tax-Panama Papers-PIL was Dismissed

PIL was dismissed for seeking further direction to CBI for investigation against Indian off shore

‹ CIT v. Geo Connect Ltd. (2017) 54 ITR 481 (Delhi)(Trib.)

CIT v. Gladder Ceramics Ltd. (2018) 401 ITR 205 (Guj) (HC) ›

Search for:

Latest Judgements

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) vs BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED (Supreme Court)
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs GE INDIA TECHNOLOGY CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED ETC (Supreme Court)
M/s Royal Drinks Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Nagpur)
The Income Tax Officer vs. Rajendra Prasad Vaish (Rajasthan High Court)
Ram Kotumal Issrani vs. Directorate of Enforcement (Bombay High Court)

Latest Articles

Powers of Income Tax Officer U/s.220(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and Stay of Demand
Provisions of section 54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961
IS INVESTMENT IN PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY, A NIGHTMARE FOR NON-RESIDENT INVESTORS – A CRITICAL ANALYSIS
NO INCOME TAX ON COMPULSORY ACQUISITION OF RURAL LAND
My Lineage: How I Was Moulded – An Inspiring Journey of S. N. Inamdar, Senior Advocate

Categories

Allied Laws
GST Law
Income-Tax Act
Tax Laws

Recent Posts

Dy. CIT (IT) v. Co-Operative Rabobank U. A. (2023) 152 taxmann.com 295 / 103 ITR 89 (SN)(Mum) (Trib)
Credit Suisse AG v. DCIT (2023) 103 ITR 38 (Trib) (SN) (Mum)(Trib)
Prasanth Nandanuru v. ITO (IT)(2023) 200 ITD 596/ 225 TTJ 110 (Hyd)(Trib)
Adobe Systems Software Ireland Ltd v. ACIT (IT) (Delhi) 201 ITD 77(Delhi)(Trib)
AB Sciex Pte Ltd v. ACIT (Delhi)(Trib) (UR)

Meta

Log in
Entries feed
Comments feed
WordPress.org

© 2024 The contents of this document are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or a formal recommendation. While due care has been taken in preparing this document, the existence of mistakes and omissions herein is not ruled out. Neither the author nor itatonline.org and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any inaccurate or incomplete information in this document nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. No part of this document should be distributed or copied (except for personal, non-commercial use) without express written permission of itatonline.org.

Discover more from Digest of case laws

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Type your email…

Continue reading