The assessment order was passed without issuing the draft assessment order as required under section 144B(1)(xvi)(b). According to the affiant, under section 144B(1)(xvi)(b) it was not mandatory and it was not indicated by the risk unit since the issue of draft assessment order fell within the purview of the risk unit. On a writ the Court held that there had been non-compliance with the mandatory procedure laid down under section 144B and hence the assessment order was non est. Therefore, the assessment order and the consequent demand and penalty notices were quashed and set aside. The matter was remitted back to act in accordance with law. Matter remanded.
Multiplier Brand Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2022) 442 ITR 202 (Bom.)(HC).Editorial: Add. CIT v. Multiplier Brand Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (2023)453 ITR 233 (SC) , order of High Court is modified and matter remanded to the Assessing Officer .
S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Final order passed without issuing draft assessment order-Matter remanded. [S. 144B(1)(xvib), 156, Art. 226]