Padam Sarup Goel v. ITO (2024) 115 ITR 68 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib) – Digest of case laws

↓ Skip to Main Content

Digest of case laws Online digest of latest case laws

Home
Articles
Ask Your Query
Cause List
Digest
Info
Judgements
Upload Your Articles & Judgements
Others

Home › Income-Tax Act › Padam Sarup Goel v. ITO (2024) 115 ITR 68 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)

Padam Sarup Goel v. ITO (2024) 115 ITR 68 (SN)(Delhi)(Trib)

S. 69A : Unexplained money-Cash deposits in bank-Demonetisation-Petrol pump-Cash flow chart-Addition is deleted.

Held that the AO had prepared the cash flow chart without setting off the opening cash in hand. Addition is deleted (AY. 2017-18)

‹ ITO v. Shree Balaji Processors (2024)115 ITR 40 / 169 taxmann.com 220 (Chd)(Trib)

Prameela Parameshwar Shettigar (Smt.) v. ITO (2024) 115 ITR 6 (SN)(Bang) (Trib) ›

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment *

Name *

E-mail *

Website

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Notify me of new posts by email.

Current ye@r *

Leave this field empty

Search for:

Latest Judgements

Anushaka Sanjay Shah (Ms) v. ITO (IT) (ITAT Mumbai)
The Maharashtra Mantralaya Shaskiy Karmachari Co-op Credit Society Ltd. vs. ITO, Ward 25(2)(1) (ITAT Mumbai)
N.P. SASEENDRAN VERSUS N.P. PONNAMMA (SUPREME COURT)
THE UNION OF INDIA VERSUS BRIJ SYSTEMS LTD (Supreme Court)
CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS VERSUS ABERDARE TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED (Supreme Court)

Latest Articles

TDS on Remuneration to Partners
Income-Tax Bill, 2025: An Insight into the Income Tax Bill 2025 – Income Tax and Role of the Constitutional Courts
Is Cross Examination an absolute right at the time of Income Tax Proceedings
Are Jewellers paying income tax by selling gold jewellery already kept in their shops?
Important Judgements of Honourable Shri B. R. Baskaran Accountant Member, Mumbai

Categories

Allied Laws
GST Law
Income-Tax Act
Tax Laws

Recent Posts

Anushaka Sanjay Shah(Ms) v .ITO (IT) ( Mum)( Trib ) www.itatonline .org
Maideen Pitchai Rawther Peer Mohammed v. ACIT (2024)116 ITR 71 (SN)(Chennai)(Trib)
Sadana Electric Store v. Dy. CIT (2024)116 ITR 33 (SN)(Lucknow)(Trib)
Royal Mahanagar Developers v. Dy. CIT (2024)116 ITR 48 (SN) (Cuttack)(Trib)
Dy. CIT v. Rajendra Gulabchand Shah (2024)116 ITR 21 (SN)(Mum)(Trib)

Meta

Log in
Entries feed
Comments feed
WordPress.org

© 2025 The contents of this document are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or a formal recommendation. While due care has been taken in preparing this document, the existence of mistakes and omissions herein is not ruled out. Neither the author nor itatonline.org and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any inaccurate or incomplete information in this document nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. No part of this document should be distributed or copied (except for personal, non-commercial use) without express written permission of itatonline.org.

Discover more from Digest of case laws

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Type your email…

Continue reading