This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 143(3) : Assessment-Charge of income-tax-Order passed by National Company Law Tribunal under section 31 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 has overriding effect over anything inconsistent contained in Income-tax Act and it shall be binding on all respective entities including other stakeholders, which include Central Government, State Government and other local bodies-Matter remanded to the Assessing Officer. [S. 4, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, S 31, 238]
Palogix Infrastructure (P.) Ltd. v. (2022) 193 ITD 329 (Kol.) (Trib.)
S. 140A : Self assessment-Failure to deposit admitted self-assessment tax-Financial difficulty-Levy of penalty is not valid. [S. 140A(3), 221(1)]
DCIT v. Karanja Terminal & Logistic (P.) Ltd. (2022) 193 ITD 385 / 215 TTJ 41/ 215 DTR 289 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Related transactions constituted 96.30 per cent of total turnover for which margin was agreed to be 15.85 percent under MAP resolution-Same rate to be applied for non USA related transactions under EDS segment.
Textron India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 193 ITD 829 / 93 ITR 58 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Resale Price Method (RPM)-Resale of goods imported from its AE to third party customers without any value addition-Resale Price Method (RPM) is Most Appropriate Method (MAM).
Randox Laboratories India (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 193 ITD 609 / 94 ITR 163 (Bang.)(Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparable-Filter-Filter applied by TPO was to be included in list of comparables regardless of fact that it was low margin earning company.[S. 133(6)]
Infor (Bangalore) (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2022) 193 ITD 478 (Bang.) (Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-CUP method-Applying of ‘QUOTE’ from third party for economic analysis using CUP method was not a justifiable method-Matter remanded.
DCIT v. Schlumber Solutions (P.) Ltd. (2022) 193 ITD 293 (Dehradun)(Trib.)
S. 90 : Double taxation relief-Foreign Tax credit-Salary income-Rule 128(9) of Rules does not provide for disallowance of Foreign Tax Credit in case of delay in filing Form No. 67,-Filing of Form No. 67 is not mandatory but a directory requirement-DTAA-India-Australia. [S. 91, 139(1), 154, 192, R. 128(9), Form no. 67, Art. 24(4)(a)]
Brinda RamaKrishna (Ms.) v. ITO (SMC) (2022) 193 ITD 840 (Bang.)(Trib.)
S. 80IA : Industrial undertakings-Infrastructure development-loss of one eligible unit is not to be adjusted or set off against profit of another eligible unit-Captive power plant-Market value of power supplied by assessee to steel division should be computed considering rate of power charged by Chhattisgarh State Electricity Board for supply of electricity to industrial consumers.
DCIT v. Godawari Power & Ispat Ltd. (2022) 193 ITD 869 (Raipur)(Trib.)
S. 80GGC : Contribution-Political parties-Failure of done to use it for object for which eligible-No disallowance can be made in the hands of donor.
ACIT v. Armee Infotech (2022) 193 ITD 728 (Ahd.)(Trib.)
S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-Sales accepted-Disallowance restricted to 12.5 % of aggregate value of alleged bogus purchases.
Kimaya Impex (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2022) 193 ITD 710 (Mum.)(Trib.)