S. 10(23C) : Educational institution-Education-Amount spent on towards food, lodging etc. of trainers/trainees-Educational activities [S. 10(23C)(vi)].
Orissa Trust of Technical Education and Training v. CCIT (2022) 287 Taxman 616 (Orissa)(HC)
Digest of case laws
Online digest of latest case laws
This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Use of computer software through/distribution agreements-Payment did not amount to royalty for use of copyright in computer software-Not taxable in India-DTAA-India-USA. [Art. 12]
CIT(IT) v. Gracemac Corporation (2022) 287 Taxman 197/113 CCH 97 (Delhi)(HC).Editorial: Notice issued in SLP filed by the Revenue , CIT(IT) v. Gracemac Corporation (2023) 292 Taxman 241 ( SC)/. SLP of Revenue is dismissed , CIT (IT) v. Gracemac Corporation Golf View Corporate (2024) 301 Taxman 172 / 468 ITR 1 (SC)S. 4 : Charge of income-tax-Carbon credit-Power generation-Capital receipt not liable to be taxed.
CIT v. Wescare (I) Ltd. (2022) 138 Taxmann.com 184 (Mad.)(HC) Editorial: Notice issued in SLP filed by Revenue, CIT v. Wescare (I) Ltd. (2022) 287 Taxman 93/113 CCH 273 (SC)S. 237: Refunds- Refunds due but issue pending appeal in the Apex Court- Refund allowed.[S.240, Art , 226 ]
Amadeus IT Group SA v. ACIT (2022) 325 CTR 246 / 210 DTR 78( Delhi)(HC)S. 226 : Collection and recovery – Modes of recovery –
Garnishee notice- Amounts taken pursuant to garnishee notice when no liability to pay income tax dues are liable to be refunded [S. 226 (3), Art . 226 ]
Prohibition of Benami Property Transaction Act, 1988
S. 49 : Appeal – High Court – Memorandum of appeal – Substantial question of law – No substantial question of law had been raised even before Supreme Court, Special Leave Petition against High Court’s judgment was to be dismissed [ ITACT, S. 260A, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 , S.100 ]
Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 .
S. 49 : Appeal – High Court – Second appeal – Substantial question of law – Order passed without framing substantial question of law- Order of High Court quashed and set aside . [ ITACT, S. 260A, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 , S.100 ]
Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988
S. 2(9): Benami transactions – Transactions or arrangements – Failure to produce documents to prove income – Property purchased in the name of wife – Sale agreement is valid .[ S. 2(9)(A)(b)(iii) ]
Ashok Kumar Subba v. Bomal Kumar Jain (2022) 287 Taxman 240 / 113 CCH 331 (Sikkim)(HC)Income Declaration Scheme of 2016,
S. 195 : Power to remove difficulties-Not depositing the first instalment with in time-Board refusing to condonation of delay-Concession and excess indulgence would have demotivating effect on honest taxpayers making regular and prompt tax deposit-Dismissal of application is held to be not justified. [S. 184, ITA, S. 119,(2),(Art.14]
Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015
S.10(1): Assessment – No summons are pending – Permitted to travel to UAE and Thailand, with a direction that he shall return to India on or before 6-4-2022, subject to furnishing of security as specified and subject to furnishing a full itinerary of his stay at UAE and Thailand, along with a functional phone number [ Art , 226 ]