S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Power of enhancement-DRP has the power to enhance the assessment on an issue not part of assessment order. [S. 145A]

S. 144 : Best judgment assessment-Failure to deduct tax at source-Leave travel allowance-Order passed without calling remand report-Matter remanded-Tribunal recorded deep appreciation for very well drafted statement of facts and grounds of appeal before CIT(A) while deciding the matter without the assistance of the assessee. [S. 10(5), 133A, 192, 201(1), 201(IA), 201(3), 250, 254(1)]

S. 144 : Best judgement assessment-Assessing Officer rejected the books of account and estimated the net profit rate of 12%-CIT(A) estimated at 6.5%.-Order of CIT(A) is affirmed-Un explained expenditure-When the income is estimated separate addition as unexplained expenditure cannot be made-Order of CIT(A) is affirmed. [S. 69C, 145(3)]

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Search and seizure-On money-Buildeer-Opportunity to cross-examine person making adverse statement against assessee never provided to assessee-Addition is not valid. [S. 131, 132, 147]

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Amalgamation-Order of assessment framed in name of non-existent entity after it ceases to be a subsisting entity-Ab initio void.

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Income from undisclosed sources-Refund of tax deducted by mistake-Deletion of addition is justified [S. 69]

S. 143(3) : Assessment-Income from undisclosed sources-estimate of income-Suppression of both purchases and sales-Gross profit alone to be assessed and not entire suppressed sales.-Prior period expenses-Disallowance is justified-Sundry creditors-Matter remanded. [S. 37(1), 69]

S. 143(2) : Assessment-Notice was issued by ITO Belgaum-Actual Assessing Officer id from Bellary-Notice was issue without jurisdiction-Order was quashed. [S. 10(10D), 127, 143(3)]

S. 143(1)(a) : Assessment-Intimation-Prima facie adjustments-Capital gains-Exemption denied-No intimation before making adjustments-Adjustments is not sustainable. [S. 11(1A), 11(2)]

S. 124 : Jurisdiction of Assessing Officer-Objection to jurisdiction cannot be challenged after completion of Assessment-Assessee submitting to jurisdiction of Assessing Officer by filing return-issue not raised in assessment proceedings-Assessment valid.[S. 124(3)]