S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-Addition was restricted to 6% of alleged bogus purchases. [S. 133(6)]
Jaswantlal J. Shah. v. ACIT (2021) 190 ITD 157 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-Addition was restricted to 6% of alleged bogus purchases. [S. 133(6)]
Jaswantlal J. Shah. v. ACIT (2021) 190 ITD 157 (Mum.)(Trib.)S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-Search and seizure-Incriminating materials belongs to company-Addition in the assessment of the director was deleted. [S. 132]
JCIT v. Narayana Reddy Vakati (2021) 190 ITD 466 / 88 ITR 23 (Hyd.)(Trib.)S. 69A : Unexplained money-Immoveable property-Purchase of property jointly with wife-Stamp valuation-Paid by wife-Addition was held to be not justified. [S. 148]
Ashish Bhardwaj. v. ITO (2021) 190 ITD 867 (SMC) (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Purchase of immoveable property-Source of investment is not doubted-Addition is held to be not valid.
ITO v. Atmiya Infrastructure. (2021) 190 ITD 11 (Ahd.)(Trib.)S. 69 : Unexplained investments-Benami transaction-Purchased land for 1.59 crores and sold for Rs.1.62 crores-Land was transferred for taking care-Addition was deleted-Assessing Officer directed to make in depth investigation. [S. 147, 148]
Didar Singh v. ITO (2021) 190 ITD 664 / 205 DTR 249 / 213 TTJ 473 (Amritsar)(Trib.)S. 68 : Cash credits-Gifts-Identity and creditworthiness was established-Addition was held to be not justified.
Tapasi Singh (Smt.) v. ITO (2021) 190 ITD 7 (Kol.)(Trib.)S. 68 : Cash credits-Foreign bank account of deceased father-Information from investigation wing-Failure to provide certified copy of bank account and bank statement-Addition was deleted-Remanded with specific direction to provide certified copy of bank statement and nexus with bank deposits. [S. 5(1)), 147, 148]
Karamjit S. Jaiswal v. DCIT (2021) 190 ITD 394 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 68 : Cash credits-Share capital at premium-Valuation report-Real estate-Identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of transactions was proved-Addition was held to be unjustified.
Renu Proptech (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 190 ITD 378 (Delhi)(Trib.)S. 68 : Cash credits-Share capital-Share premium-Share subscriber did not appear for personal attendance-Matter remanded.
Sweet Sales (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 190 ITD 461 (Kol.)(Trib.)S. 68 : Cash credits-Share capital and share premium-Copy of bank statements, confirmation of parties copy of ITR along with balance sheet was furnished-Deletion of addition was held to be justified.
DCIT v. Mahalaxmi TMT (P.) Ltd. (2021) 190 ITD 582 (Pune)(Trib.)