S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Scientific research expenditure-Petition was withdrawn [S. 35(1)(ii), 148, Art. 226]
Joshi Technologies International Inc. v. ACIT (2022) 285 Taxman 479 (Guj.)(HC)S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Scientific research expenditure-Petition was withdrawn [S. 35(1)(ii), 148, Art. 226]
Joshi Technologies International Inc. v. ACIT (2022) 285 Taxman 479 (Guj.)(HC)S. 145 : Method of accounting-Valuation of closing stock-Estimation of gross profit-Produced books of account-Order of Assessing Officer set aside. [S. 133A, 143(3)]
Subhendu Kumar Subudhi v. CIT (2022) 285 Taxman 693 / 136 taxmann.com 87 /211 DTR 178 /325 CTR 357 (Orissa)(HC)S. 145 : Method of accounting-Estimation of net profit-Interest and depreciation allowed-Question of fact. [S. 260A]
PCIT v. Varha Infra Ltd. (2022) 285 Taxman 561/ 135 taxmann.com 77/328 CTR 115 / 216 DTR 316 (Raj.) (HC)S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Submission of assessee not considered-Draft assessment order is set aside with the direction to complete the assessment after considering the response of assessee. [Art. 226]
BASF Catalysts India (P) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT (2022) 285 Taxman 431 (Mad.)(HC)S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Violation of principle of natural justice-Sufficient opportunity was not given-Order of assessment is set aside. [S. 144B(1)(xxii), Art. 226]
Sree Narayana Dharma Sabha Sreyas v. ACIT (2022) 285 Taxman 516 (Ker.)(HC)S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Natural justice-Application to file further time to file reply was not considered-Order was set aside. [S.143(3), Art. 226]
Preethi Himachal & Co. v. UOI (2022) 285 Taxman 518 / 219 DTR 365/ 329 CTR 538 (HP)(HC)S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Opportunity of hearing was not given-Order was set aside. [Art. 226]
Fifth Field Realtors (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 285 Taxman 559 (Mad.)(HC)S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Show casue notice-One day time was given-Personal hearing was not requested-Writ dismissed due to availability of alternate statutory remedy. [S. 143(3), 246A, Art. 226]
British Agro Products (India)(P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2022) 285 Taxman 141 (Mad.)(HC)S. 142(2A) : Inquiry before assessment-Special audit-Order was passed after giving adequate opportunity and considering the reply of the Assessee-Order is affirmed. [Art. 226]
Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwa Vidyalaya v. UOI (2022) 285 Taxman 208 (MP)(HC)S. 139 : Return of income-Delay in submitting ITR-V did not make e-filed return for assessment year 2008-09 invalid for denying carry forward of losses claimed in such return. [S. 80]
PCIT v. Electronics and Controls Power Systems (P.) Ltd. (2022 285 Taxman 92 / 212 DTR 233 / 326 CTR 233 (Karn.)(HC)