This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 45 : Capital gains-Failure to make full consideration-Sale deed was cancelled-Capital gains cannot be assessable. [S. 2(47)]

Anant Raj Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 188 ITD 321 / 212 TTJ 836 (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-Purchase of plots as stock in trade-Disallowance is held to be justified. [R. 6DD]

Suresh Chunnilal Sharma v. ITO (2021) 188 ITD 487 / 213 TTJ 409 / 86 ITR 22 (SN) / 205 DTR 31 (SMC)(Pune)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(iii) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Outside India-Non-Resident-Reimbursement of salary-Not taxable in India-Not liable to deduct tax at source-DTAA-India-Netherlands. [S. 5, 6, 9, 192, Art. 14, 15]

Ecorys Nederlands B. V. v. ADIT(IT) (2021) 188 ITD 264 / 87 ITR 317 / 213 TTJ 833 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Testing and certification fees paid outside India Not chargeable to tax in India-Not liable to deduct tax at source-DTAA-India-Netherland. [S. 9(1)(1), Art. 12]

Havells India Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 188 ITD 439 / 209 TTJ 214 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Royalty-Licence fee-Second proviso to section 40(a)(i) inserted with effect from 1-4-2020 is curative in nature and has retrospective effect-DTAA-India-Israel. [S. 195, 201(1), Art. 5]

Celltick Mobile Media (India) (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 188 ITD 883 / 87 ITR 32 (SN) (Mum.)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Commission-Service rendered outside India-article 7 of OECD Model Convention-Not liable to deduct tax at source-No disallowance can be made. [S. 4, 5(2), 9(1)(i), 195)

DCIT v. Inox India (P.) Ltd. (2021) 188 ITD 918 (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Brand promotion expenses-Contribution to school for construction of swimming pool-Held not allowable as deduction-Sales promotion-Gift items to Ayurvedic-Allowable as deduction.

Himalaya Drug Company v. DCIT (2021) 188 ITD 201 (Bang.) (Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-CENVAT-Input service tax credit written off in books of account-Allowable as deduction.

FIH India (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 188 ITD 124 / 198 DTR 250 / 210 TTJ 1 (Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Sales promotion-Expenses incurred in various locations-Burden is on assessee to prove that the expenses incurred was wholly and exclusively for the purpose of business-Matter remanded.

Bhola Food Products (P.) Ltd. v. JCIT (OSD) (2021) 188 ITD 653 / 87 ITR 10 (SN) (All.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-ad-hoc addition-Held to be not sustainable in eyes of law.

ACIT v. Vanesa Cosmetics (2021) 188 ITD 787 / 212 TTJ 712 / 204 DTR 393 (Delhi)(Trib.)