S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-View of the Assessing Officer is in conformity with the view of judgement of High Court-Revision is held to be not valid.[S.144C]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Assessing Officer has not examined the issue in proper perspective-Revision is held to be justified. [S. 14A, 115JB]

S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Limited liability scrutiny-Assessing Officer examined documents in the original assessment proceedings-Revision is held to be not valid. [S. 143(3)]

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Delay of 349 days-Substantial justice deserved to be preferred-Delay was condoned-Matter remanded to CIT (A) to decide on merit. [S. 250, 253(5), 271(1)(c)]

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Appeal-Condonation of delay-Delay of 271 days in filing of appeals-Justice oriented approach has to be taken while deciding the condonation of delay-Delay was condoned.

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Capital gains-Natural justice-Sham Transactions-Assessee to be allowed adequate opportunity of being heard-Matter remanded. [S. 45, 50C, 143(3)]

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Special Category States-deduction u/s. 80IC on basis of ‘NOC’-Matter restored with AO for fresh evaluation under the guidelines laid down by High Court. [S.80IC]

S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Duties-Application for admission of Additional ground-Legal ground validity of approval raised for the first time was admitted for adjudication. [S. 153D]

S. 253 : Appellate Tribunal-Delay of 486 days-Sufficient and reasonable cause for condoning delay-Cause of substantial justice deserved to be preferred-Delay of in filing appeal condoned-Appeal allowed for adjudication. [S. 253(5)]

S. 250 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Appeal fled manually-Dismissal of appeal in limine-Delay in filing appeal electronically (online filing) was condoned-Directed the CIT (A) to decide on merit. [S. 250, 254(1)]