This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 45 : Capital gains–Business income–Selling three flats and parking lot-Flats appearing in the balance sheet as investments–Assessable as capital gains and not as business income.[S. 28 (i)]

Haresh Khiamal Nanwani v. ACIT (2020)77 ITR 24 (SN) (Mum.) (Trib.)

S. 43B : Deductions on actual payment-Employees’ contribution to provident fund and employees’ state insurance fund-Payment was made before due date of filing of return–Entitle to deduction. [S. 139(1)]

Arihant Constructions v. ACIT (2020)77 ITR 171 (Vishakha)(Trib.)

S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits–Cash paid for labour charges and purchases-Business in a remote area-Disallowance is held to be not valid-Machine hire charges–less than Rs. 20000 per day–AO is directed to verify and decide. [S. 40(a)(ia)]

Debjyoti Dutta v. ITO (2020)77 ITR 17(SN) (Cuttack)(Trib.)

S. 40(b)(iii) : Amounts not deductible-Working partner– Remuneration–Interest-Rejection of books of account and assessment adopting 8 Per cent. of gross turnover as net profit-Separate deduction towards interest on partner’s capital account and remuneration to partner is to be allowed, when net profit is estimated from gross receipts. [S. 133A]

Mayasheel Construction v. Dy.CIT (2020) 77 ITR 8 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib.)

S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source–Service rendered by foreign agent–Contradictory finding–New workmen-Should be regular workmen employed in financial year relevant to assessment year–Matter remanded to the AO. [S. 80JJA, 195,254(1)]

Aquarelle India P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2020)77 ITR 2 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Consultancy fee-Failure to submit original bills cannot be a ground for making disallowance– Disallowances cannot be made on ad-hoc basis. [S. 145]

ITO v. Ascendum KPS P. Ltd. (2020) 77 ITR 12 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Share application money is capital borrowed for purpose of business or profession until shares are allotted-Allowable as deduction. Consulting charges-Matter remanded to AO. [S. 37(1)]

Panarc Consulting Group Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2020) 77 ITR 50 (SMC) (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Advances for construction of factory building-No disallowance can be made-Reimbursement of expenses–Matter remanded. [S. 40(a)(ia)]

ACIT v. Transenergy Ltd. (2020) 77 ITR 74 (SN)(Chennai)(Trib.)

S. 36(1)(iii) : Interest on borrowed capital-Interest free loans and advances to related party-Free funds available-Presumption that investments from interest-free funds available-No disallowances can be made.

ATS Infrastructure Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 77 ITR 70 (SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 32 : Depreciation-Not in business of running vehicles on hire-Not entitled to depreciation at higher rate.

Arihant Constructions v. ACIT (2020) 77 ITR 171 (SN) (Vishakha)(Trib.)