This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Gift by proprietor of Jewellery business to his close relatives-Relatives investing gifts in business and forming a partnership-Notice was held to be valid. [S.143 (1), 148, Art. 226]

Hareshbhai Mathurbhai Zinzuwadia v. ACIT (2021) 438 ITR 413 /2022) 284 Taxman 220 / 215 DTR 323/ 328 CTR 931 (Guj.)(HC)/ Darshit Asokbhai Zinzuvadia v ACIT ( 2022) 215 DTR 323/ 328 CTR 931 ( Guj)( HC

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Failure to deduct tax at source-Alternative remedy-Writ petition was dismissed. [S. 40(a)(ia), 43B, 148, Art. 226]

Bayer Vapi Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 438 ITR 495/(2022) 284 Taxman 267 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Capital gains-Land used for agricultural purposes-No new material-Reassessment notice was quashed. [S. 54B, 148, Art. 226]

Kavitaben Jaysukhbhai Zalawadiya v. ITO (2021) 282 Taxman 265 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Deduction windmill unit-Set off brought forward losses/unabsorbed depreciation-Reassessment notice was held to be not justified. [S. 32, 80IA, 143(3), 148, Art. 226]

Gujarat Ambuja Exports Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 282 Taxman 225 (Guj.) (HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Subsequent investigation-Accommodation entries-Penny stock-Capital gains-Transactions were bogus-Reassessment notice was held to be valid. [S. 45, 132, 148, Art. 226]

Zaveri and Company Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 437 ITR 100/ 205 DTR 269/ 322 CTR 441 /(2022)285 Taxman 178 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Change of opinion-No failure to disclose any material facts-Non-resident-Tax deduction at source-Reassessment notice was held to be not valid. [S. 40(a)(ia), 195, 201(1), Art. 226]

West Asia Maritime Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 437 ITR 338 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Material facts-Disclose fully and truly-Deemed cases-Details of accounting-Sufficiency of reasons need not be gone into in writ proceedings-Reassessment notice was held to be valid. [S. 147, Explanation, 2, 148, Art. 226].

SL Lumax Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 437 ITR 549 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Change of opinion-No allegation of non-disclosure of true and full facts-Proviso 1 and 3-Reassessment notice was held to be not valid. [S. 148, Art. 226]

DRS Industries Pvt. Ltd. v Dy.CIT (NO. 2) (2021) 437 ITR 687 / 205 DTR 57/ 322 CTR 289 (Mad.) (HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Real estate business-Sale between related parties-No enquiry was made in the course of original assessment proceedings-New information based on Tribunal judgement-No true disclosure of material facts-Reassessment notice was held to be valid. [S. 40A(2)(b), 148, Art. 226]

Doshi Housing v. PCIT (2021) 437 ITR 317 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No failure to disclose material facts-The four-year period not from the disposal of appeal by CIT (A)-Third proviso-Reassessment is held to be not valid-Reassessment was held to be not valid-Appeal-Consistence view taken in favour of assessee-Appeal is not maintainable. [S. 148, 260A]

PCIT v. Superior Films Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 437 ITR 230/ / 208 DTR 202/ 323 CTR 1016/ 282 Taxman 123 (Delhi)(HC)