This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Incorrect and misleading particulars-Reassessment notice is justified-Writ is not maintainable. [S. 43B(c), 148, Art. 226]

Cairn India Ltd. v. Dy. DIT (IT) (2021) 437 ITR 371 /( 2022) 284 Taman 86 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Incorrect and misleading particulars-Reassessment notice is justified-Writ is not maintainable. [S. 43B(c), 148, Art. 226]

Cairn India Ltd. v. Dy. DIT(IT) (2021) 437 ITR 371 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Survey-Search-Failure to disclose material facts-Information from Investigation wings-Bogus accommodation entries-Reassessment notice was held to be justified. [S. 132, 133(6), 147, Art. 226]

Backbone Projects Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 437 ITR 144 / 206 DTR 169 / 323 CTR 552(Guj.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Amalgamation-No failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice was held to be not valid. [S. 2(IB), 148, Art. 226]

Roca Bathroom Products Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 438 ITR 249 / (2022)213 DTR 238/ 329 CTR 464(Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Set-Off of short-term capital gains against business income-No failure to disclose material facts-Disclosure was mentioned in the assessment order-Reassessment notice was quashed. [S. 10A, 10AA, 143(3), 148, Art. 226]

First Source Solutions Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 438 ITR 139 / 206 DTR 441 / 323 CTR 18(Bom.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Tangible material-Accommodation entries-Bogus companies-Information from investigation wing-Reassessment notice is valid. [S. 143(3), 148, Art. 226]

Bharatkumar Kalubhai Ghadiya v. CIT (2021) 438 ITR 443 / 283 Taxman 254 / (2022) 324 CTR 388 209 DTR 291 (Guj.)(HC)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Violation of principle of natural justice-Order was set aside. [Art. 226]

Manickan Ravichandran v. Addl. CIT (2021) 282 Taxman 263 (Ker.) (HC)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel.-Draft assessment order-Alternative remedy-Writ petition was dismissed. [S. 253, Art. 226]

Core Diagnostics (P) Ltd. v. National e-assessment Centre (2021) 282 Taxman 30 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Final assessment without waiting for decision of DRP-Order was set aside. [S. 143(3), Art. 226]

Anand NVH Products (P) Ltd. v. National e-assessment Centre Del. (2021) 282 Taxman 485 (Delhi) (HC)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Order passed without following the procedure-Not a procedural irregularity-Not a curable defects-Final order passed without the draft assessment order was not valid. [S. 292B, Art. 226]

SHL (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 438 ITR 317 / 282 Taxman 334 / 204 DTR 233 / 321 CTR 655 (Bom.)(HC)