This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 43B : Deductions on actual payment-Late payment of Employees’ contribution to Provident Fund-Disallowance is justified.[S.36(1)(v)]

Gujarat Infrapipes P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024)111 ITR 47 (SN) (Ahd)(Trib)

S. 40A(3) : Expenses or payments not deductible-Cash payments exceeding prescribed limits-Transporters-Each payment was less than Rs 35000/-Matter remanded.

Kamal Industries v. ITO (2024)111 ITR 32 (SN) (Jodhpur)(Trib)

S. 40(a)(ia): Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Only interest and not principal-Form No 26A filed-Delay is condoned-Matter remanded. [S.194A, 201(1)]

Kamal Industries v. ITO (2024)111 ITR 32 (SN)(Jodhpur) (Trib)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Commission-Non-resident agents-Payments were made outside India-Not having a permanent establishment in India-Not liable to deduct tax at source-Allowable as deduction-DTAA-India-France-Italy-Greece-Lebanon. [S. 37(1)]

CIT (Dy.) v. Creations by Shanagar (2024) 111 ITR 7(SN) (Mum)(Trib.)

S. 40(a)(i) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Non-resident-Salary-Deducted TDS and deposited it in the government account within the specified time-Disallowance of salary cost is not justified.[S. 192]

Ayesa Ingenieria Y Arquitectura S. A. v. ACIT (IT) (2024) 111 ITR 61(SN) (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Audit of accounts-Ad-hoc disallowance-Order of CIT(A) disallowing the ad-hoc disallowance is affirmed. [S.44AB]

ACIT v. Merchant Agri Global P. Ltd. (2024)111 ITR 45 (Trib) (SN)(Mum)(Trib)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Employee Stock Option (ESOP)-Allowable as business expenditure.

Dy. CIT v. CBRE South Asia (P.) Ltd [2024] 163 taxmann.com 256 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Bogus purchase-Rough diamonds-Estimate addition-Estimated the profit @ 3% of the polished diamonds and @5% of the rough diamonds. [S. 143(3)]

Shine Star v. ACIT (Mum)(Trib) (UR)

S. 37(1): Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-ROC filing fees paid for increase in share capital-Not allowable as revenue expenditure.

Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. v. The DCIT(Ahd)(Trib)(UR)

S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Prior period expense-Method of accounting-Not proved with necessary evidence-Commission-Lack of evidence-Disallowance is affirmed. [S. 145]

Raj Auto Wheels P Ltd v. ACIT (No.1) (2024) 111 ITR 199 (Jaipur)(Trib.)