This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Employees’ Stock option plan-Loss on account of stock options-Allowable as deduction-Provision for gratuity-Allowable as deduction-Provision for approved gratuity fund-Allowable as deduction-Advance to employees welfare fund-Interest not disallowable. [S. 36(1)(iii), 40A(7), 43B]
Bharat Financial Inclusion Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 87 ITR 80 (SN) (Hyd.)(Trib.)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Debit of claim charges-Self made vouchers-No disallowance can be made-Ad hoc disallowance of 10 per cent-Not sustainable [S. 145]
Bajaj Parivahan P. Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 87 ITR 74 (SMC)(SN) (Kol.)(Trib.)
S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Expenses for insurance spare consumption-Revenue expenditure.
NLC India Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 87 ITR 121 (Chennai)(Trib.)
S. 32 : Depreciation-Uninterrupted power supply system-Part of computer-Entitled to depreciation at 60 Per Cent-Civil structure for water supply and drainage-Part of plant and machinery-Entitled to depreciation at 15 Per Cent.
NLC India Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 87 ITR 121 (Chennai)(Trib.)
S. 28(va) : Business income-Cash or kind-Compensation received for pre closure of contract manufacturing agreement-Capital receipt for loss of business or investment. [S. 4]
Sai Mirra Innopharm P. Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 87 ITR 235 (Chennai) (Trib.)
S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Registered under Companies Act, 1956-No profit motive-Collection of fees or cess-No requirement that the applicant must be trust-Denial of exemption is held to be not justified. [S. 2(15), 12AA(3) Companies Act, 1956, S. 25, 617]
Dy. CIT(E) v. Mumbai Railway Vikas Nigam Ltd. (2021) 87 ITR 1 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 10 (23C) : Educational institution-No activity carried on other than educational purposes-Exemption cannot be denied-land sold at fair market value-Approval cannot be denied-Direction of the High court was not followed-Order barred by limitation. [S. 10(23C)(vi), 12A, 147, 148]
Roland Educational and Charitable Trust v. Dy.CIT (2021) 87 ITR 51 (Cuttack)(Trib.) Roland Institute of Pharmaceutical Science v. Dy.CIT (2021) 87 ITR 51 (Cuttack)(Trib.)
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Deemed dividend-Order was passed after considering the reply and application of mind-Revision is held to be bad in law. [S. 2(22)(3), 143 (3)]
Eicher Motors Ltd v. CIT (2021) 86 ITR 530 (Delhi)(Trib.)
S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Examining the issue in the course of assessment proceedings-No discussion in the assessment order-Order is not erroneous-Interpretation-Provision inserted from date in midst of financial year-Procedural aspect-Prospective in nature.
Nalco Company, USA v. CIT (2021) 86 ITR 564 / 210 TTJ 369 / 200 DTR 275 (Pune)(Trib.)
S. 158BC : Block assessment-Undisclosed Income-No incriminating material found during search-Addition cannot be made-Delay in filing return-Interest payable till date of original assessment order–No provision to charge interest beyond date of original assessment. [s. 158BFA(1)].
V. Ramprasad Raju v. CIT (2021) 86 ITR 33 (SN) (Bang.)(Trib.)