This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Amalgamation of companies-Amalgamating company and amalgamated company operating from same address after amalgamation-Provision of Section 170(2) applicable-Participated in the reassessment proceedings-Notice and reassessment proceedings valid. [S. 147, 170(2), Art. 226]
Vama Sundari Investments (Delhi) Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 434 ITR 174 / 205 DTR 299/ 281 Taxman 260 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Assessee has right to raise objections-Duty of Assessing Officer to consider objections-Failure to consider objections-Matter remanded. [S. 147, Art. 226]
Purshottambhai Bachubhai Pitroda v. Dy.CIT (2021) 434 ITR 629 (Guj.)(HC)
S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Proper procedure to be adopted-Writ against the notice was dismissed. [S.147, Art. 226]
Palaniammal Palaniappan v. ITO (2021) 434 ITR 668 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-Information received from Investigation wing-Non application of mind-Sanction not obtained-Notice is held to be not valid. [S. 133A, 148, 151, Art. 226]
Bharatkumar Nihalchand Shah v. ACIT (2021) 434 ITR 621/ 281 Taxman 521 / 210 DTR 48 / 325 CTR 410(Guj.)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Failure to disclose true facts-Share capital-Kolkata based companies-Reassessment notice is held to be valid. [S. 143(1), 148, Art. 226]
Navnidhi Dyeing and Printing Mills Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 434 ITR 334 / 201 DTR 265 / 320 CTR 737 / 281 Taxman 542(Guj.)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-No payment of interest or remuneration-Notice on ground that payments must have been made-Not valid. [S. 80(IB)(10), 148, Art. 226]
Myhome Developers v. ACIT (2021) 434 ITR 270 (Guj.)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Accommodation entries-Policed diamonds-Subsequent information-Transaction disclosed in the original assessment proceedings were not valid-Sanction obtained-Reassessment was held to be valid. [S. 132, 148, 151, Art. 226]
Madhav Gems Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2021)434 ITR 684 / 200 DTR 297(2022) 325 CTR 489 (Guj.)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Accommodation entries-Facts disclosed in the original assessment proceedings were false-Notice is held to be valid [S.148, Art, 226]
Keshav Diamonds Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO (2021)434 ITR 700 (Guj) (HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Report of investigation wing-Non application of mind by the Assessing Officer-Notice not valid. [S. 148, Art. 226]
Alliance Filaments Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 434 ITR 537 (Guj.)(HC)