This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 32 : Depreciation-Carry forward and set off-Unabsorbed depreciation on 1-4-2002 can be carried forward and set off without taking into account number of years of such carry forward. [S. 32 (2)]
CIT v. KMC Speciality Hospitals India Ltd. (2021)436 ITR 534/ 283 Taxman 13 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-No dividend income earned-Disallowance cannot be made [R. 8D]
Tamilnadu Road Development Co. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 436 ITR 298 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-No exempt income-Disallowance cannot be made. [R. 8D]
CIT v. Tamilnadu Road Development Company Ltd. (2021)436 ITR 323 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Enhancement of disallowance is held to be not valid. [R. 8D]
CIT v. Sesa Goa Ltd (2021)436 ITR 17 / 203 DTR 97/ 321 CTR 113 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 14A : Disallowance of expenditure-Exempt income-Onus on revenue to prove that disallowance was erroneous-Without examining the accounts disallowance is not justified [R.8D]
Coforge Limited v. ACIT (2021) 436 ITR 546 / 204 DTR 273 / 322 CTR 10 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 11 : Property held for charitable purposes-Depreciation-Entitle to set off excess application of income of earlier assessment year-Precedent-Commissioner (Appeals and Tribunal must follow the decision of High Court. [S. 2(24), 11(1)(d), 12(1), 32]
Anjuman-E-Himayat-E-Islam v. ADIT (2021) 436 ITR 139 / 201 DTR 337/ 323 CTR 601 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 10B : Export oriented undertakings-Manufacture of article-Processing of iron ore amounts to manufacture-Entitle to exemption-Determination of market value required verification by the Revenue-The order of remand was justified. [S. 10B(7), 80IA (8), 80IA (10)]
CIT v. Sesa Goa Ltd (2021)436 ITR 17 / 203 DTR 97 / 321 CTR 113(Bom.)(HC)
Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 .
S. 5 : Time and manner of payment – Declaration accepted and Form 3 issued specifying demand — Revocation of Form 3 without affording adequate opportunity to be heard — Principles of natural justice violated — Revocation of Form 3 is held to be not valid [ Art , 226 ]
Mahendra Corporation v. PCIT (2021)436 ITR 527/ 321 CTR 415/ 282 Taxman 150/ 203 DTR 425 (Bom) (HC)