S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Service of notice-Question of fact-No substantial question of law. [S. 147, 260A]
Manoj Kumar Sharma v. ITO (2021) 438 ITR 693 (All.)(HC)S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Service of notice-Question of fact-No substantial question of law. [S. 147, 260A]
Manoj Kumar Sharma v. ITO (2021) 438 ITR 693 (All.)(HC)S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Amalgamation-Notice issued after amalgamation in name of erstwhile company-Similarity in names but Permanent Account Number the same-Bona fide mistake-Correcting the mistake and final assessment order was passed-Order was held to be valid. [S. 147, 292B]
Vedanta Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 438 ITR 680 (Mad.)(HC)S. 147 : Reassessment-Free trade zone-Disallowance of expenditure-Reassessment notice was held to be justified. [S. 10A, 148, Art. 226]
Vestas Technology R&D Chennai (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 282 Taxman 195 (Mad.)(HC)S. 147 : Reassessment-Foreign currency-Interest-Professional fees-Consulting fee etc-Reassessment notice was held to be justified. [S. 37(1), 148, Art. 226]
Vedanta Ltd. v. ADIT (IT) (2021) 439 ITR 719/ 282 Taxman 504 (Mad.)(HC)S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Insurance business-Profit on sale of investments-Prior to assessment year 2011-12 not liable to tax-First Schedule, Rule 5-Provision of section 115JB which enables companies to compute book profit are not applicable to insurance companies-Reassessment notice was quashed. [S. 44, 115JB. 148, Art. 226]
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 282 Taxman 184 (Mad.)(HC)S. 147 : Reassessment-Method of accounting-Estimate of income-Statement of manager operations-Reopening was held to be justified. [S. 145, Art. 226]
Dr. Sajan Hedge v. ACIT (2021) 282 Taxman 39/ ( 2022) 440 ITR 389 (Mad.)(HC)S. 147 : Reassessment-Export oriented undertakings-Survey-Claimed higher profit-Reassessment notice was held to be justified. [S. 10B, 133A, 148, Art, 226]
Orchid Chemicals & Pharmacauticals Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 282 Taxman 257 (Mad.)(HC)S. 147 : Reassessment-Search and Seizure-Accommodation entries-Initiation of reassessment proceedings was held to be justified. [S. 68, 132, 148, Art. 226]
Anderson Biomed (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 282 Taxman 490 (Guj.)(HC)S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Information from Investigation wing-Bogus accommodation entries-Notice of reassessment was held to be valid. [S. 131, 148, Art. 226]
Priya Blue Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 437 ITR 155 / 213 DTR 189/ 326 CTR 576 (Guj.) (HC).Editorial: SLP of assessee dismissed , Priya Blue Industries Pvt Ltd v. ACIT ( 2022) 443 ITR 6 (St)/ 287 Taxman 187 (SC)S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Share application money-Shell bogus companies-Information from investigation wing-Notice and reassessment was held to be valid. [S. 68, 131, 148, Art. 226]
Kottex Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 437 ITR 211 / 282 Taxman 432 /(2022) 216 DTR 405/ 328 CTR 784 (Guj.)(HC)