This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Survey-Excess claim for exemption-Alternative remedy-No conclusive finding on validity of the reassessment notice-Order of single judge is reversed-Directed to pursue the statutory remedy. [S. 10B, 133A, 148, Art. 226]
Orchid Pharma Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 439 ITR 387 /(2022) 212 DTR 164/326 CTR 340 /129 taxmann.com 404 / 282 Taxman 257 (Mad.)(HC) Editorial : Decision of single judge is reversed, Orchid Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021)439 ITR 380 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Facts disclosed were incorrect-Reassessment notice was held to be valid. [S. 148, Art. 226]
Cairn India Ltd. v. Dy. DIT(IT) (NO. 2) (2021) 439 ITR 245 / 283 Taxman 529 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 144B : Faceless Assessment-Principle of natural justice-Cash credits-Order was set aside. [S. 68, 143(3), Art. 226]
Nagalinga Nadar M. M. v. Add. CIT (2021) 439 ITR 147 / 207 DTR 241 / (2022) 284 Taxman 244 / 324 CTR 195 (Mad.)(HC)
S. 139 : Return of income-Voluntary retirement scheme-Bank employee-Claimed exemption after by filing the letter after passing of assessment order-Filing the revised return-Delay was not condoned by CBDT-High Court directed the CBDT to condone the delay and grant refund without interest. [S. 10(10C), 89(1), 119(2)(b), 139(5), 143(1), Art. 226]
Devendra Pai v. ACIT (2021) 439 ITR 532/ 208 DTR 97/ 323 CTR 848/ ( 2022) 285 Taxman 438 (Karn.)(HC)
S. 115JB : Book profit-Provision for bad and doubtful debts-Corresponding amount reduced from loans and advances on assets side of balance sheet-Net provision is shown-Provision not to be added in computing book profit. [S. 36(1)(vii)]
PCIT v. Narmada Chematur Petrochemicals Ltd. (2021) 439 ITR 761 (Guj.)(HC)
S. 80HHB : Projects outside India-Gross total income-Additional deduction to be computed on the basis of recomputed gross total income.
CIT v. Bhageeratha Engineering Ltd. (No. 2) (2021) 439 ITR 713 (Ker.)(HC)
S. 68 : Cash credits-Agricultural income-Cash deposits-Failure to establish the source-Addition was valid.
Rakesh Kumar Gupta v. CIT (2021) 439 ITR 360 (All.)(HC)
S. 35D : Amortisation of preliminary expenses-Share premium expenses-Not part of capital employed-Cost of acquisition does not constitute cost of project-cost of acquisition of companies could not be treated as asset for allowing deduction under section 35D.
Subex Ltd. v. CIT (2021) 439 ITR 495 / 2022) 285 Taxman 350 (Karn.)(HC)