This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 143(2) : Assessment-Mandatory issue of notice-Jurisdiction-Transfer from Shillong to Guwahati-Order passed by Assessing Officer, Guwahati without issuing notice under section 143(2) and only in pursuance with notice issued by ITO, Shillong who did not enjoy jurisdiction over assessee was null and void. [S. 120, 143 (3)]
Balaji Enterprise v. ACIT (2021) 187 ITD 111 / 211 TTJ 213 / 201 DTR 81 (Guwahati)(Trib.)
S. 132(4) : Search and seizure-Introduction of undisclosed income as share capital of company-statement of assessee-transactions made by him in FY 2009-2010 and including amount in return for AY 2010-11. AO accepting admission but bringing sum to tax in 2009-10. Sum could not be taxed in AY 2009-10. [S. 68, 132, 153A]
Dy.CIT v. Babuprasad Ramdayalji Shah (2021) 87 ITR 54 (SN) (Ahd.)(Trib.)
S. 115JB : Book profit-Subsidies-Refund of VAT and Excise duty-New Industry-Cannot be considered as income for purpose of book profit even though same was credited in profit and loss account.
DCIT v. Century Plyboards (I) Ltd. (2021) 187 ITD 35 (SN) / 209 TTJ 273/ 203 DTR 229 (Kol.)(Trib.)
S. 115JB : Book profit-Disallowance made under section 14A cannot be considered while computing book profit under clause (f) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB. [S.14A]
DCIT v. Century Plyboards (I) Ltd. (2021) 187 ITD 35 (SN) 209 TTJ 273/ 203 DTR 229 (Kol.) (Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arms’ length price-Comparable-leading company without segmental information cannot be accepted as a comparable.
Ocwen Financial Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 187 ITD 861 (Pune)(Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Assessee engaged in software development services, comparable engaged in wide variety of services-Not comparable without segmental analysis. TPO bound by the directions of the DRP. [S. 92CA, 144C]
Netscout Systems India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 187 ITD 773 (Pune)(Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Management fee-TPO did not resort to transfer pricing exercise adjustment-Addition was to be deleted. [S. 92C(1)]
Henkel Chembond Surface Technologies Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 187 ITD 406 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comaprable-Cannot be comparable with business support services-Functionally dissimilar cannot be comparable-Abnormal growth due to restricting cannot be cpmparable-Company had outsourced services to third party vendors cannot be held to be comparable.
Deutche CIB Centre (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 187 ITD 506 / 209 TTJ 137 (Mum.)(Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Capacity utilization adjustment-allowed as the assessee is in the initial years of operation-Matter remanded0 Treatment of depreciation as operating expense-Depreciation held as operating expense for R&D segment considering interlink with manufacturing segment.
Sigma Aldrich Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2021) 187 ITD 374 (Bang.)(Trib.)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm’s length price-Comparable-Functionally similar it could not be excluded-TPO applied RPT filter of 25 per cent in case of assessee company, comparable company having RPT of more than 50 per cent could not be accepted as valid comparable-Working capital adjustment is allowed.
Microsoft Corporation (India) (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT (2021) 187 ITD 94 (Delhi)(Trib.)