S. 153A : Assessment-Search–Limitation-Exchange of information under Indo-Swiss DTAA-Reference made to Swiss authorities for period prior to 1-4-2011 not maintainable under amended Article 26-Benefit of exclusion of time under Explanation (ix) to S. 153B not available-Assessment orders rightly held barred by limitation-DTAA-India-Swiss. [S.69C,90, 132, 143(3), 153B, Expl. (ix), Art. 14, 26]

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Audit objection-Limitation-Amended provisions of section 149 apply to notices issued after 1-4-2021 even for earlier assessment years-Notice issued within six years not barred-Audit objection must clearly state that assessment was not made in accordance with Act-Reopening valid only to limited issues supported by definite audit objection-Matter remanded. [S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 149, Art. 226]

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice Jurisdiction of Assessing Officer-Review of original scrutiny assessment impermissible-No fresh tangible material-Loans and expenditure fully disclosed in limited scrutiny-Notice under section 148A(b), order under section 148A(d) and notice under section 148 quashed. [S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 149, 151, Art. 226]

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Sanction-Specified authority-Time limits-Surviving time-Effect of extension under 2020 Act-Approval of specified authority-Though approval under section 151(1) by Principal Commissioner for passing order under section 148A(d) and issuing notice under section 148 was valid, notices/orders issued beyond “surviving time” as explained in UOI v. Ashish Agarwal(2022) 444 ITR 1 (SC) were barred by limitation and liable to be quashed. [S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 149(1)(b), 151(1), Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020, S. 3(1), Art. 226]

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Limitation-Alleged escapement on share transactions-Short-term capital gains below Rs. 50 lakhs-Notice issued beyond three years-In absence of material showing escapement exceeding threshold, notice held barred by limitation-Reassessment invalid. [S 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), 149(1)(a), Art. 226]

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry/providing opportunity before issue of notice-Information received under CBDT risk management strategy-Search-related information-Approval of Principal Commissioner sufficient-AO not required to obtain two identical approvals-Writ petition dismissed. [S. 148, 151, Art. 226]

S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Where High Court, while issuing notice in writ petition, permitted assessment proceedings to continue but directed that final assessment order, if passed, shall not be given effect to till disposal of writ petition-High Court ultimately quashing notice under section 148A(b), order under section 148A(d) and notice under section 148-Assessee stating before Supreme Court that it intended to challenge completed assessment order on merits independently and not on grounds urged in writ petition-Revenue’s appeal held not required to be examined and dismissed. [S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 136]

S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry and providing opportunity before issue of notice-Information received under risk management strategy framed by CBDT-Approval of Principal Commissioner obtained-AO cannot be compelled to obtain two identical approvals under sections 148A and 151. SLP dismissed. [S. 148, 151, Art. 136]

S. 147 : Reassessment-Cash credits-Addition of unexplained share premium not forming part of recorded reasons for reopening is unsustainable-If no addition is made on issue for which assessment was reopened, no other addition can be made-Reassessment order quashed. [S. 68, 148, 260A]

S. 147: Reassessment-Audit objection-Non-resident-Assessing Officer must apply independent mind-Audit objection is only “information” and not a command to reopen-Reassessment cannot be used to review a concluded scrutiny assessment-Change of opinion not permissible-In absence of failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts, extended period of six years not available-Limitation restricted to four years from end of relevant assessment year-Notice issued beyond four years held barred by limitation-Notice under section 148A(b), order under section 148A(d) and notice under section 148 quashed. [S. 148A(b), 148A(d), 149, Art. 226]