S. 68 : Cash credits-Share capital-Identity and genuineness is established-Deletion of addition is held to be valid.
PCIT v. Amravati Infrastructures Developers (P) Ltd. (2020) 272 taxman 133 (P&H)(HC)S. 68 : Cash credits-Share capital-Identity and genuineness is established-Deletion of addition is held to be valid.
PCIT v. Amravati Infrastructures Developers (P) Ltd. (2020) 272 taxman 133 (P&H)(HC)S. 54F : Capital gains-Investment in a residential house-Invested sale proceeds of old asset in new property before due date of filing belated return and took possession within three years-Entitled to exemption though she had not invested sale proceeds in Capital Gain Account Scheme before due date of filing of return under section 139(1). [S. 45, 139(1)]
CIT v. Umayal Annamalai (Smt.) (2020) 273 Taxman 146 (Mad.)(HC)S. 45 : Capital gains-Purchase and sale of land-Assessable as capital gains and not as business income. [S. 28 (i)]
CIT v. Kishan House Builders Association (2020) 273 Taxman 451 (Karn.)(HC)S. 41(1) : Profits chargeable to tax-Remission or cessation of trading liability-Outstanding for more than three years-Addition cannot be made as cessation of liability.
PCIT v. Adani Agro (P) Ltd. (2020) 273 Taxman 430 (Guj.)(HC)S. 40(a)(ia) : Amounts not deductible-Deduction at source-Amendment made to section 40(a)(ia) by Finance Act, 2010 inserting proviso therein would apply retrospectively with effect from assessment year 2005-06.
CIT v. Archean Granites (P) Ltd. (2020) 273 Taxman 511 (Mad.)(HC)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Wholly and exclusively-Remuneration paid to promoter-Director-Consultation-Allowable as deduction though not attended the office for six years.
PCIT v. VVF Ltd. (2020) 273 Taxman 503 (Bom.)(HC)S. 37(1) : Business expenditure-Capital or revenue-Hotel business-Renovation and repair of hotel rooms is allowable as revenue expenditure.
Pandian Hotels Ltd. v. Dy.CIT (2020) 273 Taxman 256 (Mad.)(HC)S. 36(1)(vii) : Bad debt-Income offered as income-Reduced from asset side of balance sheet-Order was set aside. [S. 36(2)]
Hajee A.P. Bava and Company Const. (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 272 taxman 230 (Karn.)(HC)S. 35 : Scientific research-No product was manufactured in a particular unit-Allocation of expenses is held to be not justified-Research and development-Capital expenditure towards research and development R & said expenditure was to be excluded from toil capital expenditure while allowing expenditure on R & D units.
Microlabs Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 273 Taxman 434 (Karn.)(HC)S. 28(i) : Business income-Electricity company-Electricity distribution-Efficiency gain amount which was not refunded to customers, said surplus fund being at disposal of State Electricity Regulatory Commission, could not be included in business profit. [S. 4]
Dy. CIT v. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd. (2020) 273 Taxman 56 (Delhi) (HC)