This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 10 (23C): Educational institution-Demerger-Financial help to hospital-No violation of provision-Withdrawal of exemption is not justified. [S. 10(23)(vi)]

Seth Ramjidas Modi Vidhya Niketan Society. v. CIT (2021) 186 ITD 119 / 197 DTR 33 / 209 TTJ 118 (Jaipur)(Trib.)

S. 10 (23C) : Educational institution-Solely for educational purpose and not for earning profits-Substantially financed by Government-Eligible for exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act-Explanation to clause 10(23C)(iiiab) w.e.f. 1-4-2015 setting out minimum threshold of 50 per cent for institution to be financed by Government for claiming benefit of exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiab) is prospective in nature. [S. 10 (23C)(iiiab)]

DCIT v. Shri Vaishnav Polytechnic College Govn by VSK Market Tech Educational Society. (2021) 186 ITD 378 (Indore)(Trib.)

S. 10(10C) : Public sector companies-Voluntary retirement scheme-Bank employee-Exit Option Scheme-Ex gratia amount-Tax deducted at source-Not entitle to exemption. [R. 2BA]

Krishnan Achary v. ITO (2021) 186 ITD 73 / 210 TTJ 399 (Cochin)(Trib.)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Sale of software to Indian distributors-Not in the nature of copy right-Not taxable as royalty-DTAA-India-Sweden. [Art. 12]

Qliktech International AB v. DCIT (2021) 186 ITD 315 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 9(1)(vi) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Payment made by assessee for market analysis, maintenance of online data, customer database, etc.-Matter remanded for reconsideration-DTAA-India-USA. [Art. 12]

Adadyn Technologies (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT(IT) (2021) 186 ITD 690 (Bang.)(Trib.)

S. 9(1)(i) : Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Business connection-Business of acquiring advertisement time (‘Airtime’)-Attribution of 30 percent of gross revenue from India is held to be not justified-DTAA-India-Mauritius. [Art. 5, 7]

ESPN Star Sports Mauritius v. ACIT (2021) 186 ITD 546 / 197 DTR 190 / 209 TTJ 74 (Delhi)(Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue – Share premium- Accepting the value of shares issued at premium could not be considered as erroneous or prejudicial to interest of revenue – Revision is held to be bad in law [ S.56(viib) , Rule 11U , 11UA ]

Trimex Fiscal Services (P) Ltd v. PCIT (2020) 181 ITD 10 / 190 DTR 381 / 205 TTJ 611 (Kol) (Trib.)

S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue – Order passed under section 144 overlooking provision of section 184 (5) – Order is erroneous – Revision is held to be valid [ S.144, 184 (5) ]

Saroj Print Arts v. PCIT (2020) 181 ITD 502 / 194 DTR 171 / 207 TTJ 185 (Mum.) (Trib.)

S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel – Non-resident – Shipping business – Order under section 172(4) without passing draft assessment order – Matter remanded-DTAA -India -Singapore [ S.9(1)(1), 172 (4), Art , 24 ]

ISS Shipping India (P) Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2020) 181 ITD 616 (Rajkot)(Trib.)

S. 54 : Capital gains – Profit on sale of property used for residence – Surrender of old flat and received new residential flat after development – Not offering the capital gain in return and claiming under wrong section would not disentitle from claiming deduction under section 54F of the Act . [ S.45, 54F ]

Satish S. Prabhu v. ACIT (2020) 181 ITD 63 (Mum.)(Trib.)