This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 147 : Reassessment – After the expiry of four years- Block assessment- Addition deleted by CIT (A) – Notice to reassess the same is held to be not valid [ S. 132, 148 ,158BC , Art , 226 ]
Audhut Timblo v. ACIT (2020) 420 ITR 62 / 196 DTR 335 (Bom) (HC)
S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty – Concealment – Quantum addition challenged in appeal to High Court –Substantial question of law – Debatable – Levy of penalty is held to be not justified [ S.260A
PCIT v. Harsh International Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 431 ITR 118 (Delhi)(HC)
S. 264 :Commissioner – Revision of other orders – Rejection of application on ground of bar of limitation – Failure to decide revised capital gains- Matter remanded to decide the issue on section 50C [ S. 50C, 54 , Art , 226 ]
Prabhudas Veljibhai Chaudhari v. PCIT (2021) 431 ITR 246 (Guj)(HC)
S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue -Assessing Officer taking one of two possible views on issue — Order not erroneous — Commissioner cannot set aside order .[ S.80IA, form 10CCB ]
Sutures India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT (2021) 431 ITR 332 / 278 Taxman 112(Karn)(HC)
S. 263 : Commissioner – Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue – Deduction granted on a wrong view of the Law —Revision is held to be justified [ S.10A ]
Harman Connected Services Corporation India Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT. (2021) 431 ITR 401/ 198 DTR 144/ 319 CTR 24 (Karn)(HC)
S. 260A : Appeal – High Court – Delay of 342 days – Retirement of Officer – Delay was condoned with cost .
Adarsh Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 431 ITR 71/ 197 DTR 308/ 318 CTR 510 / 279 Taxman 488(Guj)(HC)
S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal – Duties- Delay in filing appeal -Tribunal cannot dismiss appeal for non-prosecution[ S.253,254(2), ITAT R. 24, Art , 226 ]
Dolphin Metal (India) Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 431 ITR 666/ 280 Taxman 21 (Guj)(HC)
S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal – Duties- Deletion of disallowance without giving reasons – Order not valid – Matter remanded . [ S.40(a)(ia)]
PCIT . v Subex Technologies Ltd. (2021) 431 ITR 592/ 280 Taxman 294 (Karn)(HC)
S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal – Duties- Allowing the expenditure without examining the evidence – Perverse order – Matter remanded .[ S.37 (1), 132,153A ]
CIT v. Anantha Refinery Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 431 ITR 64 / 319 CTR 205/ 198 DTR 241 / 278 Taxman 208 (Karn) (HC)
S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal – Duties- Business expenditure — Commission payments — Order passed without considering the material and application of mind -Matter remanded to Tribunal
B. Fouress (P.) Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2021) 431 ITR 344/ 279 Taxman 412 (Karn)(HC)