This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws
S. 260A : Appeal – High Court – Review –Low tax effect -Audit objection – Appeal decided as per CBDT Circular dt 8 -8 -2019- No error apparent on the face of the record Review petition was dismissed .[ S.268A]
ITO v. Kalimuddin Badnawarwala (2020) 191 DTR 359 / 315 CTR 587 (MP) (HC)
S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal – Duties- Additional income offered -Confirming the levy of concealment penalty without giving an opportunity is held to be bad in law – Matter remanded to the Appellate Tribunal . [ S.271(1)(c)]
S & P Foundation P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2020) 195 DTR 10 (Mad) (HC)
S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal – Duties- Charitable Trust – Computation of income -Commercial sense – Matter remanded [ S. 2(24), 2(45), 11 ]
Cutchi Memon Union v. Dy. CIT(E) (2020) 195 DTR 351/(2021) 318 CTR 335 (karn) (HC)
S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal – Duties- Cryptic and suffers from the vice of non application of mind- Matter remanded to the Tribunal . [S.37 (1)]
CIT v. Rjamahal Silks Partnership Firm (2020) 194 DTR 25 / ( 2021 ) 323 CTR 853 (Karn) (HC)
S.225 :Collection and recovery -Stay of proceedings – Pendency of first appeal – Bank account cannot be attached without giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing – Attachment of bank account was set aside – Assessing Officer must objectively decide the application for stay considering that an appeal lies against his order – The matter must be considered from all its facets, balancing the interest of the assessee with the protection of the Revenue.- Directed to hear the stay application with in six weeks from the date of the order [ S. 226 , 250, Art . 226 ]
Mansukhlal Amritlal Modi v. ITO (2020) 195 DTR 255 / 318 CTR 320 (Bom) (HC)
S. 158BC : Block assessment – Satisfaction – Recorded after competition of assessment – Capital gains – Transfer-A satisfaction note is sine qua non and could be prepared at either of following stages , at the time of or along with the initiation of proceedings against the person searched under section 15C of the Act , along with the assessment proceedings under section 158 BC and immediately after the assessmmeent proceeings are completed under section 158BC of the person sercched – Order of Tribunal is quashed . [ S.2(47)(v) , 45, 132 158BD ]
CIT v. N. Ramakrishnan (2020) 193 DTR 93 / 316 CTR 461 (Ker) (HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment- Reasons communicated and reasons raised are different – Recorded reason was supplied after completion of assessment – Reassessment is bad in law [ S.148 ]
PCIT v. Haxaware Technologies Ltd. (2020) 191 DTR 73 (Bom.)(HC)
S. 147 : Reassessment – Charitable Trust- Corpus donation – Change of opinion- No new facts – Reassessment is held to be bad in law [ S. 2(15) 11, 12A , 148 Art , 226 ]
N.H. Kapadia Education Trust v. ACIT (2020) 190 DTR 184 (Guj) (HC)
S. 144 : Best judgment assessment – Addition made cash deposited during demonetization period. – Addition on account of business income – Violation of principle of natural justice –
Matter remanded to Assessing Officer [ S.142 (1), Art , 226 ]
Kandan & Kannan Medical Agency v. ITO (2020) 194 DTR 172 (Mad) (HC)
S. 92C : Transfer pricing – Arm’s length price – Comparable – Test of functional similarity applied by Tribunal is in consonance with legal position discussed herein above— Order of Tribunal is affirmed [ S.92B(2), 260A ]
PCIT v. Open Solutions Software Services P. Ltd. (2020) 191 DTR 76 / 315 CTR 497 (Delhi) (HC )