This Digest of case laws is prepared by KSA Legal and AIFTP from judgements reported in BCAJ, CTR, DTR, ITD, ITR, ITR (Trib), Chamber's Journal, SOT, Taxman, TTJ, BCAJ, ACAJ, www.itatonline.org and other journals
Click here to download the pdf versions of the Digest of case laws

S. 153 : Assessment-Limitation-Remand to DRP-Tribunal-Order was not passed within stipulated time-Directed to refund the amount with interest. [S. 144C(13), 153(2A), 244A, Art. 226]

Freight Systems (India) (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 206 DTR 163/(2022)) 328 CTR 643 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Approval was granted by Development Commissioner but on such approval Ratification Certificate was not yet given by Board of Approval-Reassessment notice was held to be not valid. [S. 10B]

Indus Teqsite (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2021) 206 DTR 129 / 322 CTR 689 / 133 taxmann.com 134 /(2022) 285 Taxman 302 (Mad.)(HC).Editorial : Order of single judge set aside ; Indus Teqsite Pvt. Ltd v. Ministry of Finance (2021)435 ITR 613/ 204 DTR 224/ 322 CTR 100 (Mad) (HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Disputed facts-Alternative remedy-Order is not barred by limitation-Writ is not maintainable. [S. 148, 153(2), Art. 226]

Madras Race Club v. Dy.CIT (2021) 203 DTR 338 / 322 CTR 392 (Mad.)(HC) Editorial : Affirmed by division Bench Madras Race Club v. Dy. CIT (2021) 206 DTR 297 / 323 CTR 180 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Disputed facts-Alternative remedy-Interim order-Order is not barred by limitation-Writ is not maintainable-Order of single judge is affirmed. [S. 148, 153(2), Art. 226]

Madras Race Club v. Dy. CIT (2021) 206 DTR 297 / 323 CTR 188 (Mad.)(HC) Editorial : Order of single judge is affirmed Madras Race Club v. Dy. CIT (2021) 203 DTR 338 / 322 CTR 292 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-No new material-Matter remanded to consider the issue on change of opinion. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Magma Hdi General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. ITO (2021) 439 ITR 329 / 206 DTR 57 / 322 CTR 750 (Cal.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-With in four years-Change of opinion-No new material-Reassessment notice was quashed. [S. 148, Art. 226]

Cognizant Technology Solutions India P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 439 ITR 571 /206 DTR 401 (Mad.)(HC) Editorial : Order of single judge in Cognizant Technology Solutions India P. Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 437 ITR 425 / 206 DTR 408/ 323 CTR 427 (Mad.)(HC) set aside

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Export oriented undertakings-Valid approval by STPI-Mistake or omission committed by the Assessing Officer-No failure to disclose any material facts-Reassessment notice was quashed. [S. 10B, 148, Art. 226]

Kone Elevators (India) (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 206 DTR 137 / 322 CTR 697 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Free trade zone-Export Oriented units-Start of manufacturing-Location of Industrial undertaking-Failure to disclose material facts-Reassessment notice was held to be valid. [S. 10A(2), 148, Form No. 56F, Art. 226]

FCA Engineering India (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 206 DTR 43 (Mad.) (HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Discrepancy and mismatch-MB Shah Commission report-Illegal mining in State of Odisha-Reason to believe-Reassessment notice is held to be valid. [S. 148, 154, Form 26AS, Art. 226]

Triveni Earthmovers (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 205 DTR 190 / 322 CTR 406 (Mad.)(HC) Editorial : Affirmed by division Bench Triveni Earthmovers (P) Ltd v. ACIT (2021) 206 DTR 279/322 CTR 934/ 283 Taxman 297 (Mad.)(HC)

S. 147 : Reassessment-After the expiry of four years-Discrepancy and mismatch-MB Shah Commission report-Illegal mining in State of Odisha-Reason to believe-Excess production-Issue subject matter of the reopening of assessment was never discussed in the original assessment proceedings-Failure to make full and true disclosure-Reassessment notice is held to be valid. [S. 148, 154, Form 26AS, Art. 226]

Triveni Earthmovers (P) Ltd. v. ACIT (2021) 206 DTR 279 / 322 CTR 934 / 283 Taxman 297 (Mad.)(HC) Editorial : Order of single judge is affirmed, Triveni Earthmovers (P.) Ltd v. ACIT (2021) 205 DTR 190/ 322 CTR 406 (Mad.)(HC)